2026-01-15 00:40:50

FOCIL is far from perfect at the moment, and that's something to admit. However, in terms of overall direction and approach, I do agree. Projects like this often require an evolution process, and I believe there will be more room for refinement in the future.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BoredApeResistance

· 21h ago

I've seen through this logic a long time ago, but to be honest, it's just betting on whether future iterations can save the situation.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArchaeologis

· 01-15 01:11

On-chain artifacts all need to be refined like this; early-stage items are originally experimental fields. The key is whether the logical framework can hold up, and the details can be polished over time.

View OriginalReply0

NeverPresent

· 01-15 01:10

Speaking of FOCIL, this thing definitely needs more consideration, but the overall direction is fine; evolution is just like this.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 01-15 00:59

ngl, been there with projects that "just need time to evolve"... that's what i told myself before 2022 happened lol. FOCIL's direction feels solid on paper but watch those collateral ratios closely, not financial advice but... seen too many health factors tank when devs are still "polishing"

Reply0

SatoshiSherpa