2026-01-15 00:37:35

When gold reached its peak last cycle, Bitcoin didn't just follow—it exploded. We're talking a 560% surge from bottom to top. That correlation tells you something interesting about how institutional money flows between traditional safe havens and digital assets when the macro environment shifts. The pattern: while gold acts as that reliable hedge, Bitcoin moves with exponentially more volatility once the risk-on narrative kicks in. Worth tracking if we're heading into another gold-topping scenario.

BTC1,91%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RetroHodler91

· 10h ago

560%? Are those numbers real? It seems like there's a lot of hype involved.

View OriginalReply0

NFTragedy

· 10h ago

Is 560% an outrageous number? Are institutions really this crazy?

View OriginalReply0

MidnightMEVeater

· 10h ago

Good morning, night creatures. 560%, right? This is what you call the sandwich feast of institutions in the dark pool. Gold is as stable as a dog, but Bitcoin is dancing disco in the risk narrative—truly a midnight arbitrageer's buffet.

View OriginalReply0

DaoGovernanceOfficer

· 10h ago

ngl the correlation thesis here is empirically weak—you're cherry-picking one cycle. data suggests bitcoin's macro sensitivity is way more nuanced than just "gold peaks = btc moon." volatility ≠ causation. worth actually auditing the signal-to-noise ratio before we call this a governance framework for trades lol

Reply0

YieldWhisperer

· 10h ago

nah hold up, the math doesn't actually check out here. gold peaks don't *cause* btc moves—they're just noise in the same macro soup. seen this exact narrative pushed every cycle since 2017, conveniently ignores all the times they decoupled completely

Reply0

BagHolderTillRetire