2026-01-15 00:23:27

The recent image released by the White House has sparked heated discussions, seemingly asking Greenlanders a multiple-choice question, but in fact reflecting deeper strategic considerations.

Everyone is clear that this rhetoric is identical to the drug prohibition excuse of the past—external threats are just a pretext. The real reasons have long been on the table: first, the key mineral resources hidden in Greenland; second, the competition for military influence in the Arctic region; third, the desire to squeeze out competitors' presence in the north.

Interestingly, the Danish Prime Minister has actually made a significant concession. She explicitly stated that as long as it does not involve sovereignty issues, almost anything can be negotiated—resource development rights, strategic cooperation, base establishment—all are on the table. But the other side stubbornly refused to give up and instead took a different approach.

Behind this deadlock, it reflects the intensifying resource competition and strategic game among major powers in the Arctic region. For the global market, such geopolitical changes often trigger fluctuations in energy and raw material prices.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BoredWatcher

· 01-17 22:11

Playing the geopolitical game again, it's nothing more than competing for minerals and military positioning, very hypocritical. Everyone wants a bite of the Arctic cake, and energy prices are soaring accordingly. Denmark has already taken a step back, but they're still not satisfied; their appetite is really big. This trick is really old, just changing the shell to keep deceiving. Resource competition is heating up, and retail investors are about to get cut again.

View OriginalReply0

BrokenYield

· 01-17 09:34

nah this is just textbook geopolitical theater. rare earths up, arctic leverage play down—rinse repeat. denmark already capitulated on everything except the flag, yet still not enough? that's when you know it's pure power consolidation masked as strategy. watch commodity futures, not the headlines.

Reply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-16 02:46

Coming back with this again? The real goal is resource minerals, who would believe the surface story? Denmark has already conceded this much, and they still want sovereignty—what a damn big appetite. Someone has been eyeing the Arctic cake for a long time, and now it's a bit late to act. Energy prices are probably going to be affected by this again, damn it. History just keeps repeating itself, just a different excuse. So annoying.

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinConnoisseur

· 01-15 00:52

Playing the geopolitical game again, ultimately it's all about those rare minerals and energy interests.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractRebel

· 01-15 00:51

Here we go again with this? Resource competition disguised as geopolitical rivalry, ultimately it still comes down to who can secure mineral resources and influence.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPhobia

· 01-15 00:41

Here we go again with this set? Resources + geopolitics, an eternal theme --- Denmark has already lowered its head and is still trying to be tough, in plain words, it's about sovereignty --- That piece of land in the Arctic is really valuable, rare earth minerals enough for war --- This logic is exactly the same as the Middle East oil wars back then, same soup, different medicine --- The key is how this will affect mineral prices, brothers holding positions, be careful --- Once you see through it, the surface reasons don't matter, those three behind the scenes are the real gold and silver --- The Danish Prime Minister is actually quite clever, giving everything but not sovereignty, is the other side stupid or just wants to test this line --- Is the Arctic game heating up a prelude to an energy crisis, or am I overthinking it --- This Greenland drama seems to be affecting the global raw materials market --- The套路太深了, these days geopolitics is even more dangerous than the crypto world

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-15 00:40

Here we go again with this set. Basically, it's about grabbing mineral resources and strategic military locations, wrapped up in a pretty package.

View OriginalReply0