The past few years of crypto development have been truly frustrating. Writing a contract requires repeated legal reviews, open-sourcing tools risks being labeled as an "illegal funding channel," and even GitHub records need to be backed up just in case. The entire industry has long been in a regulatory vacuum—SEC and CFTC act independently, sometimes saying you're a security, other times claiming you're a commodity, leaving developers confused. Even more absurd, the Department of Justice once prosecuted wallet developers on charges of "assisting in fund transfers," implying that tools allowing users to self-manage assets are illegal.
But the tide is turning. Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis and Democratic Senator Ron Wyden jointly proposed the "Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act," which is rare in today's polarized Washington—it's more difficult for both parties to agree on crypto policy than it is for Bitcoin to halve.
The core idea of the bill directly addresses the root problem: as long as developers do not directly control user assets, they do not need to undergo the layered approvals and registrations required of banks or money transfer agencies. Simply put—focus on technology, avoid handling user funds, and regulators won't come knocking. This is undoubtedly a shot in the arm for the entire industry, allowing developers to finally breathe a little easier.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MelonField
· 01-17 19:37
Someone finally said it out loud. These past few years have really scared me off.
Bipartisan agreement? I need to see if this bill can really pass. Those folks in Washington talk like they’re full of it.
Just don't touch user funds. Sounds simple, but I’m afraid it’s just another trap.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 01-17 18:50
Finally, someone has spoken out. These past few years have really been about survival in the cracks.
It's so rare for both parties to reach a consensus on crypto, even more so than seeing genuine institutions adopt it.
As long as you don't reach into the fund pool, this line is finally clear.
View OriginalReply0
WalletInspector
· 01-15 05:37
Wow, can the two parties really unify their stance on crypto? That's so rare... However, this bill is a lifesaver for developers; they finally don't have to worry all day long.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxiety
· 01-14 23:53
Damn, finally someone is supporting the developers. Bipartisan cooperation is really rare.
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegen
· 01-14 23:52
Someone finally said it out loud, these past few years have truly been like walking on thin ice. The fact that the two parties reached a consensus... I can't even believe it's real.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 01-14 23:51
Wait, can the two parties really reach an agreement? How big of a deal is this? I haven't seen the SEC come out to oppose it.
View OriginalReply0
ThreeHornBlasts
· 01-14 23:49
Someone finally dared to speak out. These past few years have really been exhausting.
It's rare for the two parties to reach an agreement. It seems that regulators also realize that sidelining developers is not a long-term solution.
Just avoid directly touching the money. This logic is actually very clear. Why didn't I think of it before?
The part about GitHub backups hit a nerve. Living these days is really frustrating.
Let's wait until the bill is really implemented. For now, focus on writing good code.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollector
· 01-14 23:42
It's really rare for two parties to team up on this, but will this bill actually become law, or is it just another empty promise?
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollector
· 01-14 23:31
Someone finally said it out loud. These past few years have truly been like walking on thin ice.
If this bill passes, that would be amazing. A bipartisan consensus itself is a miracle.
However, I still have some concerns about how to ensure that regulatory agencies will actually follow through on this.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoChain
· 01-14 23:31
Someone finally said it out loud. These past few years have been truly suffocating.
Lumis and Warden's collaboration is perfect; bipartisan cooperation is achievable... I just want to ask, what else is impossible?
Developers don't handle the money, only focus on writing code—that's what really matters.
The past few years of crypto development have been truly frustrating. Writing a contract requires repeated legal reviews, open-sourcing tools risks being labeled as an "illegal funding channel," and even GitHub records need to be backed up just in case. The entire industry has long been in a regulatory vacuum—SEC and CFTC act independently, sometimes saying you're a security, other times claiming you're a commodity, leaving developers confused. Even more absurd, the Department of Justice once prosecuted wallet developers on charges of "assisting in fund transfers," implying that tools allowing users to self-manage assets are illegal.
But the tide is turning. Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis and Democratic Senator Ron Wyden jointly proposed the "Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act," which is rare in today's polarized Washington—it's more difficult for both parties to agree on crypto policy than it is for Bitcoin to halve.
The core idea of the bill directly addresses the root problem: as long as developers do not directly control user assets, they do not need to undergo the layered approvals and registrations required of banks or money transfer agencies. Simply put—focus on technology, avoid handling user funds, and regulators won't come knocking. This is undoubtedly a shot in the arm for the entire industry, allowing developers to finally breathe a little easier.