We often say that encryption technology has changed wealth, but its true significance goes far beyond that—it is reshaping the inclusivity of global finance.
Imagine an African farmer or a small business owner in Southeast Asia. They may have real assets and stable income, but are kept out of the financial system due to cumbersome banking requirements—formal credit records, income proof, collateral—that block their access. This is not an isolated case; billions of people worldwide face this dilemma.
There is an interesting approach in a certain project: it completely rewrites the rules of credit assessment. No longer relying on traditional banking standards, it states—anything that can be verified on-chain for value and ownership could serve as collateral. Satellite data predicting crop yields? Yes. Cross-border e-commerce receivables? Yes. Community reputation scores? Also yes. As long as the community governance layer recognizes this value model, you can obtain credit and loans.
This is powerful because it breaks down geographical barriers. Anyone with an internet connection can access the same global credit market 24/7. An entrepreneur in a remote mountain area no longer depends on local high-interest lenders but can borrow cheaper capital from a unified global liquidity pool. The borrowed stablecoins can be directly used to purchase production materials or pay for international services—truly enabling borderless financial flow.
Of course, technological feasibility is one thing; legal frameworks and user education are real challenges. But this model has already proven that "decentralized credit based on verifiable assets" is feasible technically. Its future is clear: inclusive finance is not achieved by traditional banks opening branches in remote areas, but through open-source financial protocols that, with a smartphone, can reach every corner of the Earth.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainBard
· 2h ago
It sounds ideal, but what about when it actually gets implemented? How do you handle places without internet?
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinator
· 7h ago
Really, this set of logic bypasses all those crappy bank rules, but I still want to ask—are on-chain reputation points reliable?
---
Wow, satellite data verifying crop yields sounds pretty sci-fi.
---
It sounds good, but in reality, most people don't have internet, mobile wallets, or know how to use them.
---
This is what crypto should be doing, not just speculating and cutting into the chives.
---
Community governance layer recognizing value models... sounds like DAO stuff again. I just want to know if it can really run.
---
I like the idea of breaking geographical restrictions, but what about regulation? Will governments allow it?
---
Using stablecoins to buy production materials seems simple when you think about it, but how about execution? How long will it take to get through the legal framework?
---
The future of inclusive finance should indeed be like this, but right now, there are still too many idealistic notions.
View OriginalReply0
DataChief
· 01-14 23:53
To be honest, I believe in the logic of on-chain asset valuation, but can farmers really understand it? Education costs are probably the biggest factor.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAll
· 01-14 23:48
Indeed, on-chain credit is much more flexible than the rigid standards of traditional banking.
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 01-14 23:42
Thinking too idealistically, on-chain verification ≠ actual execution. How to pass the regulatory hurdle?
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoer
· 01-14 23:29
This is what Web3 is really about, not the get-rich-quick scheme of trading cryptocurrencies.
We often say that encryption technology has changed wealth, but its true significance goes far beyond that—it is reshaping the inclusivity of global finance.
Imagine an African farmer or a small business owner in Southeast Asia. They may have real assets and stable income, but are kept out of the financial system due to cumbersome banking requirements—formal credit records, income proof, collateral—that block their access. This is not an isolated case; billions of people worldwide face this dilemma.
There is an interesting approach in a certain project: it completely rewrites the rules of credit assessment. No longer relying on traditional banking standards, it states—anything that can be verified on-chain for value and ownership could serve as collateral. Satellite data predicting crop yields? Yes. Cross-border e-commerce receivables? Yes. Community reputation scores? Also yes. As long as the community governance layer recognizes this value model, you can obtain credit and loans.
This is powerful because it breaks down geographical barriers. Anyone with an internet connection can access the same global credit market 24/7. An entrepreneur in a remote mountain area no longer depends on local high-interest lenders but can borrow cheaper capital from a unified global liquidity pool. The borrowed stablecoins can be directly used to purchase production materials or pay for international services—truly enabling borderless financial flow.
Of course, technological feasibility is one thing; legal frameworks and user education are real challenges. But this model has already proven that "decentralized credit based on verifiable assets" is feasible technically. Its future is clear: inclusive finance is not achieved by traditional banks opening branches in remote areas, but through open-source financial protocols that, with a smartphone, can reach every corner of the Earth.