Recently, Polygon's ecosystem activities have been frequent, but the trend of POL seems somewhat complicated—there are bright spots as well as hidden concerns.
First, the good news. Polygon Labs just invested over $250 million to acquire Coinme and Sequence, directly targeting the US stablecoin payment market. This combination has indeed boosted market confidence, with POL rebounding by 300%. Meanwhile, network activity is also on the rise, with transaction volume soaring to 3.9 billion in January last year, and micro-payment transactions reaching 67.7 million, hitting a three-year high. Another detail is that POL is implementing a deflationary model, burning up to 1 million tokens daily, along with the newly launched liquidity staking products, aiming to create a healthier economic model.
But problems have emerged. The number of active addresses has plummeted by 83%, from 2.9 million to 489,000, which is quite alarming. Such a sharp shrinkage in user base raises questions about the sustainability of growth. More painfully, despite ecosystem growth and increasing fees, investors are still worried whether these values are truly reflected in the POL token.
From a technical perspective, the outlook is also not optimistic. In the past 24 hours, the MACD on the candlestick chart has broken below the signal line, short-term moving averages are in a bearish alignment, and the price is oscillating below the middle line of the Bollinger Bands. These signals together indicate short-term downward pressure.
Therefore, the current POL is like a project in transition—its strategy looks good, and the fundamentals are showing growth, but during execution, a large number of users have been lost. This contradiction needs time to be resolved.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
QuorumVoter
· 10h ago
Active addresses plummeted by 83%? This number is really astonishing, it feels like closing your ears to steal bells.
---
$250 million acquisition sounds impressive, but what about the users who left? How do you account for that?
---
POL's recent actions are outrageous—burning tokens while losing users. Who can believe this is a good sign?
---
Honestly, looking at trading volume spike is useless; active addresses are the real truth.
---
So POL now just looks good on paper; the actual situation is uncertain.
---
After a 300% rebound, it still needs to decline; with such poor technicals, short-term is uncertain.
---
Question: Can ecosystem growth and user loss happen at the same time? How does this logic add up?
---
It feels like Polygon is fooling itself—data looks good but it can't retain users. That's the root problem.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 10h ago
The active address drop of 83% really indicates a problem; just burning coins and acquisition hype are not enough.
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeacher1
· 10h ago
Active addresses plummeted by 83%. This data really can't be sustained anymore. A 300% rebound looks nice, but users have all left.
---
2.5 billion spent just to see this result? Feels a bit awkward.
---
To put it simply, the data looks good but users are gone—typical false prosperity.
---
Wait, ecosystem costs are increasing but the number of addresses has been cut by 80%? That logic is a bit strange...
---
MACD has broken below, moving averages are bearish, probably still going to take more hits in the short term.
---
Polygon's recent moves feel like self-deception... as long as the data sounds good, right?
---
Are users really using it, or are they just jumping in for the rebound and then leaving? That’s the core issue.
---
Token burning, liquidity staking, acquisitions... lots of tricks, but can't keep people around—awkward.
---
Fundamental growth and token value aren't increasing—who's actually footing the bill?
---
I think this is a turning point. Either hold on or continue to sink.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezer
· 10h ago
The active addresses dropping to 489,000 is outrageous. No matter how impressive the coin burning is, it can't reverse this downward trend.
Recently, Polygon's ecosystem activities have been frequent, but the trend of POL seems somewhat complicated—there are bright spots as well as hidden concerns.
First, the good news. Polygon Labs just invested over $250 million to acquire Coinme and Sequence, directly targeting the US stablecoin payment market. This combination has indeed boosted market confidence, with POL rebounding by 300%. Meanwhile, network activity is also on the rise, with transaction volume soaring to 3.9 billion in January last year, and micro-payment transactions reaching 67.7 million, hitting a three-year high. Another detail is that POL is implementing a deflationary model, burning up to 1 million tokens daily, along with the newly launched liquidity staking products, aiming to create a healthier economic model.
But problems have emerged. The number of active addresses has plummeted by 83%, from 2.9 million to 489,000, which is quite alarming. Such a sharp shrinkage in user base raises questions about the sustainability of growth. More painfully, despite ecosystem growth and increasing fees, investors are still worried whether these values are truly reflected in the POL token.
From a technical perspective, the outlook is also not optimistic. In the past 24 hours, the MACD on the candlestick chart has broken below the signal line, short-term moving averages are in a bearish alignment, and the price is oscillating below the middle line of the Bollinger Bands. These signals together indicate short-term downward pressure.
Therefore, the current POL is like a project in transition—its strategy looks good, and the fundamentals are showing growth, but during execution, a large number of users have been lost. This contradiction needs time to be resolved.