2026-01-14 22:46:08

Here's a thought experiment worth sitting with: imagine locking in 100 years of your salary today for just $97k—but there's a catch. You can't touch it or move it for a full decade.

Would you take that deal?

It's not really about the numbers. It's about what you actually believe will happen in ten years. Because that's essentially the proposition Bitcoin presents to early believers: severe illiquidity now in exchange for potential exponential wealth later.

The tension is real though. A decade is a long time to watch your capital sit idle in a volatile asset while the world keeps spinning. But then again, 100 years of purchasing power at today's rates? That math doesn't work unless you genuinely think Bitcoin's adoption trajectory keeps accelerating.

Maybe the real question isn't whether you'd do it—it's why you wouldn't, or what would make you comfortable enough to actually hold that long.

BTC-0,12%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenomicsShaman

· 11h ago

97k locked for ten years for a hundred-year salary? To be honest, I am willing to gamble; anyway, there's not much good to invest in right now.

View OriginalReply0

MainnetDelayedAgain

· 16h ago

According to the database, the answer to this question depends on whether you believe there will still be ten years left after ten years. Locking in $97k for a 100-year salary sounds like a promise made by the project team, but the Bitcoin promise has been baking for 15 years... How many decades have passed since the last "imminent explosion" promise? It’s recommended to record it in the Guinness World Records. The real question is not whether you dare to gamble, but whether you can endure the psychological torment of these ten years. While others make quick money, you are here meditating.

View OriginalReply0

MelonField

· 01-14 23:15

ngl ten years lock-in is already enough torture, I can't choose... unless that 100 years can be used to eat.

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 01-14 23:15

Bro, if that assumption is really true... ten years without moving, how strong must one's mental resilience be? I'm afraid I would break down in the second year.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingToReadDocs

· 01-14 23:15

Ten years without moving, do you dare to bet? Anyway, I don't dare... --- That's right, the key is whether you believe BTC will really take off. I'm still observing now. --- 100 years' salary locked for 10 years? Sounds like a trap haha. --- The problem isn't money, it's mindset. Can you really tolerate your account shrinking over ten years? --- This is the test of the hodl faith. Most people can't pass this level. --- So, it still depends on your expectations for the future. If you bet right, you'll go to heaven; if you bet wrong, then... --- Ten years is too long, my friend. I don't have that much patience. --- Actually, I just want to ask, do you really believe it will double in ten years? --- That's very true, but in reality, how many people can hold on for ten years without moving?

View OriginalReply0

RooftopVIP

· 01-14 23:13

ngl ten years of lock-up sounds crazy, but if you can really seize that window... it's all about faith, right?

View OriginalReply0

ChainPoet

· 01-14 23:11

Ten years of locking up assets for a hundred years of income? Sounds good, but I still can't trust this thing to stay stable without collapsing for ten years.

View OriginalReply0