Crypto KYC verification platforms have become a real pain point in the industry. We're talking about a 98% failure rate across most services out there.



Let's be honest—when biometric-based solutions promise convenience but end up being broken most of the time, it defeats the purpose entirely. Some palm scan verification apps operate at 70% failure rates, and there's legitimate concern about the teams behind them.

Then there's the zkME verification process, which many users are encountering during token sales. You go through the entire KYC workflow, jump through all the hoops, complete every requirement... and the system still manages to create friction at nearly every step.

This is exactly why mainstream adoption stumbles. Users are ready to participate in the crypto ecosystem, but the onboarding infrastructure isn't ready for prime time. Until verification platforms actually deliver reliable, frictionless experiences, we're stuck dealing with these bottlenecks repeatedly. It's not just an inconvenience—it's a genuine barrier to entry that the industry needs to address urgently.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTArchaeologisvip
· 01-17 13:38
98% failure rate... Isn't this the "counterfeit authentication" of the digital age? What should be a pass for entry has instead become a stumbling block. Reminds me of the early days of online identity verification—history tends to repeat itself.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 01-15 18:44
NGL, a 98% failure rate? That number sounds outrageous. It seems like these teams just launched without proper planning.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 01-14 23:10
98% failure rate? Laughs. Feels like I'm a beta tester for a failed project.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerkervip
· 01-14 23:10
98% failure rate? Bro, this isn't a bug, it's a feature. The exchange is helping us filter out the newbies.
View OriginalReply0
ForumMiningMastervip
· 01-14 23:09
98% failure rate? That's outrageous, is it real? Using fingerprint recognition with a 70% failure rate, still going strong, hilarious. I've also encountered the zkME process, and every time I want to smash my phone. This is the real killer for adoption, not a market issue. If the infrastructure is so poor, how do you expect users to come in?
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuyvip
· 01-14 23:09
98% failure rate? That's so terrible, I'd rather verify manually.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiGreenievip
· 01-14 23:09
98% failure rate? Isn't that just gambling? LOL
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidatedvip
· 01-14 23:04
98% failure rate? That's hilarious. This is the current state of Web3 infrastructure.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 01-14 22:45
98% failure rate? Bro, this is not a product, it's torture.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)