Dismissing charity-backed tokens just because they're memecoins? That's pretty narrow-minded. You get access to real value—thousands in holdings—but pass on it purely based on labels. Here's the thing: what matters more to you, actually making a dent in supporting causes you claim to care about, or protecting your image? It's worth asking whether gatekeeping yourself from an entire asset class serves your mission or just feeds your pride.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainSleuth
· 9h ago
Honestly, this logic really hits the nail on the head... Are you truly doing this for charity or just to maintain your image?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifier
· 9h ago
ngl, "charity-backed tokens" requires *significantly* more rigorous validation than whatever this narrative's pushing... the tokenomics alone demand proper auditing before anyone talks about "real value"
Reply0
LongTermDreamer
· 9h ago
Haha, you're right. I thought the same three years ago, but I missed out on a wave and now I regret it immensely.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHomeless
· 10h ago
NGL, there's some logic to this. Charity coins are just charity coins; don't gild the lily with memecoin. Those who truly care have already taken action, and they don't need to prove themselves with this kind of coin, right?
Dismissing charity-backed tokens just because they're memecoins? That's pretty narrow-minded. You get access to real value—thousands in holdings—but pass on it purely based on labels. Here's the thing: what matters more to you, actually making a dent in supporting causes you claim to care about, or protecting your image? It's worth asking whether gatekeeping yourself from an entire asset class serves your mission or just feeds your pride.