When it comes to the RWA (Real World Assets) track, everyone is talking about a trillion-dollar scale story. But insiders know very well—how easy is it to truly bring a warehouse or a bond onto the chain? Just issuing an "asset token" and calling it a day? That's simply not realistic.
Institutions are even more troubled. Legal teams frown at their screens, and risk control departments are busy: Who is the counterparty? How to prevent leakage of price information? Most importantly—can the settlement process seamlessly integrate with traditional systems? None of these questions can be avoided.
In this deadlock, a chain called Dusk is quietly working behind the scenes. It doesn't boast about being a financial super fleet every day; instead, it seems to have tailored a "high-speed corridor" for traditional finance that complies with EU regulations and connects to crypto channels. Recently, it has formed a deep partnership with the Dutch regulated MTF exchange NPEX. It may seem insignificant, but the signal is strong: this is not about hype, but about actually starting to do business.
Honestly, the three main bottlenecks for bringing RWA onto the chain are: too much transparency equals no privacy, compliance requirements are hard to tackle, and settlement efficiency lags behind traditional finance rhythms. Most chains are confident they can handle one or two of these and start shouting about revolution. But the financial system is an organic whole—missing even one link causes the entire process to stall.
Dusk’s approach is a bit different; it aims to solve all these problems at once.
First, privacy. It has integrated zero-knowledge proof technology (zk-SNARKs) directly into the underlying architecture of smart contracts, called XSC. The effect is straightforward: sensitive data such as asset types, price levels, and counterparties involved on-chain are invisible to ordinary users. Compared to those "naked" RWA solutions on the chain, this is the real starting point that institutions can actually use—no large financial institution is willing to expose all their trading information and negotiation chips to the sunlight.
Regarding settlement integration, Dusk is also exploring solutions. The EU’s compliance framework is indeed strict, but because of this strictness, solutions that work in the EU can generally be applied in other markets. Dusk plans to establish a solid compliance foundation in Europe first, then expand outward—this is much more reliable than projects that grow wildly in unregulated places and only realize the need for compliance later.
Of course, there are still many hurdles from concept to actual adoption by major institutions. But at least the direction is right—not just fantasizing about a future of finance, but solving real problems step by step. This is exactly what the RWA track needs most.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WagmiWarrior
· 01-17 15:17
Really, most projects are just storytelling, but Dusk's approach is indeed more solid.
Privacy compliance settlement is a one-stop solution, more reliable than those who boast about single-point breakthroughs.
The collaboration with NPEX is the real signal; projects that quietly do their work are often overlooked.
I feel that the true opportunity for RWA is in those that are actually solving problems, not just marketing every day.
This time, it might really be different. If the EU framework works smoothly, it will be useful for other markets as well, the logic checks out.
But from paper to actual implementation, there's still a long way to go; we’ll have to see how it performs in the future.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterZhang
· 01-17 05:06
Oh no, another blockchain that seems serious about getting things done. Is Dusk this time genuinely committed? Unlike others that keep hyping trillion-dollar figures every day, it seems more like quietly making a fortune.
Speaking of privacy + compliance, this combo really hits the pain points of institutions. Those previous naked RWA (Real World Asset) schemes, honestly, were just about scamming investors. But from concept to actual large investors using it... there are quite a few hurdles in between. It all depends on whether Dusk can hold out until it breaks even.
Using EU regulations as a template is indeed a bold move, almost like adding chips to their own hand. I'm just worried that it might turn into another high-stakes gamble project, and by then, when everything resets, no one will care.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreather
· 01-14 22:50
Hey, when it comes to RWA, the truth is you have to solve each problem one by one; you can't just keep bragging.
Really, Dusk's combination of privacy + compliance is more credible, compared to those who talk about revolution every day.
The EU approach is strict, but at least it's a serious effort to implement, unlike some projects stuck in the middle.
Whether it works or not ultimately depends on whether institutions are willing to use it; that's the real test.
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoat
· 01-14 22:49
Another project that quietly gets things done, much more reliable than those that shout slogans every day.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 01-14 22:40
From a technical architecture perspective, Dusk's solution indeed addresses the three core pain points of RWA. However, I am more concerned about the performance data of XSC under actual trading pressure—will the computational complexity of zk-SNARKs become a new bottleneck in high-frequency scenarios? Worth monitoring.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 01-14 22:26
It's RWA again, privacy again, compliance again—I'm getting ear calluses from hearing it all. Let's see who can truly implement it.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 01-14 22:23
Dusk again? Alright, this time it really doesn't seem so虚
I trust the EU compliance part; finally, some chains are willing to get their feet on the ground
Only when privacy is well handled do institutions dare to get involved, that's right
Let's wait for the data from NPEX before commenting; right now it's all just on paper
By the way, the real takeoff of RWA depends on who can fill all three gaps. Dusk has a chance, but don't hype it too much
The underlying integration of zero-knowledge proofs is still somewhat interesting, better than those after-the-fact remedies
When it comes to the RWA (Real World Assets) track, everyone is talking about a trillion-dollar scale story. But insiders know very well—how easy is it to truly bring a warehouse or a bond onto the chain? Just issuing an "asset token" and calling it a day? That's simply not realistic.
Institutions are even more troubled. Legal teams frown at their screens, and risk control departments are busy: Who is the counterparty? How to prevent leakage of price information? Most importantly—can the settlement process seamlessly integrate with traditional systems? None of these questions can be avoided.
In this deadlock, a chain called Dusk is quietly working behind the scenes. It doesn't boast about being a financial super fleet every day; instead, it seems to have tailored a "high-speed corridor" for traditional finance that complies with EU regulations and connects to crypto channels. Recently, it has formed a deep partnership with the Dutch regulated MTF exchange NPEX. It may seem insignificant, but the signal is strong: this is not about hype, but about actually starting to do business.
Honestly, the three main bottlenecks for bringing RWA onto the chain are: too much transparency equals no privacy, compliance requirements are hard to tackle, and settlement efficiency lags behind traditional finance rhythms. Most chains are confident they can handle one or two of these and start shouting about revolution. But the financial system is an organic whole—missing even one link causes the entire process to stall.
Dusk’s approach is a bit different; it aims to solve all these problems at once.
First, privacy. It has integrated zero-knowledge proof technology (zk-SNARKs) directly into the underlying architecture of smart contracts, called XSC. The effect is straightforward: sensitive data such as asset types, price levels, and counterparties involved on-chain are invisible to ordinary users. Compared to those "naked" RWA solutions on the chain, this is the real starting point that institutions can actually use—no large financial institution is willing to expose all their trading information and negotiation chips to the sunlight.
Regarding settlement integration, Dusk is also exploring solutions. The EU’s compliance framework is indeed strict, but because of this strictness, solutions that work in the EU can generally be applied in other markets. Dusk plans to establish a solid compliance foundation in Europe first, then expand outward—this is much more reliable than projects that grow wildly in unregulated places and only realize the need for compliance later.
Of course, there are still many hurdles from concept to actual adoption by major institutions. But at least the direction is right—not just fantasizing about a future of finance, but solving real problems step by step. This is exactly what the RWA track needs most.