Ethereum brought programmability to the chain, but complexity came along as a passenger. By embedding a virtual machine at the base layer, every program runs with the full overhead of the network.
Bitcoin chose differently. Instead of burdening the settlement layer, it keeps the core lean and lets the ecosystem build on top. Second-layer tools and protocol upgrades extend what you can do without compromising what Bitcoin does best—secure, reliable settlement.
Two roads. One says add everything to the foundation. The other says keep the foundation solid, and build outward.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MercilessHalal
· 18h ago
This approach to Bitcoin is indeed clever, slimming down the base layer to let the second layer do the heavy lifting, while Ethereum is bloated beyond control.
View OriginalReply0
HappyToBeDumped
· 18h ago
Bitcoin's approach is really awesome; simplicity is power.
Bitcoin's system still has some value, but the Ethereum ecosystem's prosperity... never mind, no need to compare.
To put it nicely, it really depends on who has more ecosystem users.
Both paths have people making money; it just depends on which one you bet on.
I just want to ask, with BTC staying simple like this, can it really meet future demands?
Ethereum is more complex, but it can do pretty much anything.
That's true; a solid foundation is needed to build tall buildings, right?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 18h ago
Late at night, I looked at the gas tracker and was overwhelmed. Bitcoin's approach is truly excellent. Ethereum requires paying a life cost for every interaction, while Bitcoin remains steady as the settlement layer. Layer 2 solutions can do whatever they want; this is the architecture of smart people. I've saved so much gas fees over the years, and it turns out I was using the wrong chain.
View OriginalReply0
StakeTillRetire
· 18h ago
Bitcoin's architecture is truly outstanding; simplicity is power.
Bitcoin maximalist detected, but the logic is indeed solid.
Ethereum's complexity is starting to be a bit overwhelming; isn't quietly making money more appealing?
The trade-off between scalability and security mainly depends on user experience.
However, Layer2 is also saving Ethereum; don't jump to conclusions too early.
Bitcoin, keep it simple—this philosophy I fully embrace.
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueen
· 18h ago
Honestly, the architecture of BTC is truly brilliant. Not everything needs to be built at the core layer.
This is the mindset of a scientist. ETH's overly complex approach ends up causing trouble for itself.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeGazer
· 18h ago
I respect the philosophy of Bitcoin: lightweight core with a heavy focus on ecology. It's simply the pinnacle of design thinking.
Ethereum brought programmability to the chain, but complexity came along as a passenger. By embedding a virtual machine at the base layer, every program runs with the full overhead of the network.
Bitcoin chose differently. Instead of burdening the settlement layer, it keeps the core lean and lets the ecosystem build on top. Second-layer tools and protocol upgrades extend what you can do without compromising what Bitcoin does best—secure, reliable settlement.
Two roads. One says add everything to the foundation. The other says keep the foundation solid, and build outward.