2026-01-14 21:26:12

BTC weekly chart: the 50-period moving average is seeing plenty of short interest right now.

Here's what keeps me puzzled—so many traders stick with EMA when SMA actually holds up better in backtests. Seriously, run the numbers yourself. Simple moving average edges out exponential every single time for reliability.

The EMA? Already been breached. But the SMA—that level still holds real significance.

BTC1,75%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

mev_me_maybe

· 01-17 10:54

Another discussion on SMA vs EMA. Really, most people just like to follow the trend and use EMA, too lazy to test the data themselves.

View OriginalReply0

MultiSigFailMaster

· 01-17 09:47

SMA indeed can hit hard, EMA keeps breaking again and again. This time, we need to see if the 50-period can hold.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMortgage

· 01-14 21:53

SMA is indeed more reliable than EMA, but in actual operation, you still have to look at the market sentiment.

View OriginalReply0

MainnetDelayedAgain

· 01-14 21:46

According to the database, the debate between SMA and EMA has been fermenting for the 847th day. More than half a year has passed since someone last presented backtesting data to argue about which one is more reliable... SMA will eventually realize the dream of defeating EMA, just wait for the bloom.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeOnChain

· 01-14 21:39

Can SMA really be trusted? I still think EMA is more sensitive... But you need to show the backtest data.

View OriginalReply0