2026-01-14 20:52:10

Think about it—when you strip away all the noise, AI-related assets really need to live on-chain. That's where transparency and true ownership happen. Keeping them off-chain just defeats the whole purpose. The infrastructure is there, the tech works. Why not embrace it?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlashLoanPrince

· 01-17 20:47

Whether it's on-chain or off-chain, it's all fake; the key is having someone to take the bait.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeLover

· 01-17 04:18

Putting data on the chain is indeed attractive, but who will pay for this pile of on-chain data?

View OriginalReply0

Whale_Whisperer

· 01-14 21:10

To be honest, I'm tired of this logic. On-chain transparency? Ha, then how do you explain these end-of-month wash trading?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXM

· 01-14 21:09

On-chain is the true way, and this is where the significance of decentralization lies.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPhoenix

· 01-14 21:08

It's the same old story... I support transparency through on-chain data, but the problem is, how many projects have we seen that claim to be "on-chain" but end up a complete mess? Faith is faith, but we can't let our guard down.

View OriginalReply0

WalletAnxietyPatient