A notable political irony emerged in UK policy discourse: authorities have pursued restrictions on X and its AI tool Grok, citing concerns over user-generated satirical content—yet simultaneously, Microsoft's AI systems continue operating within British law enforcement frameworks to make consequential decisions affecting specific communities. The contrasting approaches to AI regulation raise questions about consistency in tech governance and selection criteria for which platforms face scrutiny. This disparity illustrates how AI policy often operates under different standards depending on the technology provider and institutional context.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
JustHereForMemesvip
· 9h ago
Haha, playing double standards so skillfully, the regulatory small platform's review content, and then turning around to let Microsoft's AI make decisions for the police. LOL
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalkervip
· 9h ago
Double standards, bro. Just thinking about it makes me uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperervip
· 9h ago
Wow, double standards clearly at play... Banning Grok but allowing Microsoft AI to do whatever it wants with the police, who thought of this?
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashiervip
· 9h ago
Haha, this move by the UK is really clever. Banning meme creators on X but pretending not to see Microsoft's AI... I've never seen such double standards.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)