True transparency requires data to back it up. For projects like $TRIA, what should we look at? Actual on-chain activity, user experience with self-custody wallets, and an executable technical roadmap—these are the hard indicators. Ecosystem partners do add points, but ultimately, user retention and genuine market traffic determine success or failure. These types of projects are worth ongoing attention; the key is whether their subsequent performance can deliver on their promises.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityHuntervip
· 9h ago
At 3 a.m., I just pulled the on-chain data for $TRIA... active addresses have decreased by 17% compared to the previous period. This is outrageous; no matter how you put it, it's pointless.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobbervip
· 9h ago
The data speaks for itself; the story takes a backseat. How is the TRIA user retention data? That's the real test.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapistvip
· 9h ago
That being said, data indeed doesn't lie, but the problem is that anyone can manipulate on-chain data.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetectivevip
· 9h ago
In plain terms, data doesn't lie. No matter how many flashy ecosystem partners there are, it's all meaningless. The key is whether on-chain activity has increased.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)