Want to list a trading pair? First, check out these indicators. On-chain activity, trading volume, market heat — these will all be included in the evaluation. How does the price volatility perform? What is the level of participation? These data points will directly impact the decision to list.



Project teams need to be cautious; USD1 liquidity must be stabilized, having just trading pairs is not enough. Compliant market operations, legitimate promotion channels — these are basic requirements. Additionally, official communication channels must remain open to facilitate exchange verification of project information; don’t play the game of losing contact. In simple terms, make the project solid, standardize market promotion, and keep official contact information always online — this is the key to getting listed.
USD10,01%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MindsetExpandervip
· 01-17 13:29
Projects with unstable liquidity should have been dead long ago, yet they still get listed.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImpostervip
· 01-17 02:48
Basically, if liquidity is unstable, don't expect to list. I've seen this trick many times. The real test is whether the project team is reliable—no fake stuff. Listing tokens isn't that easy; data, compliance, and communication are all essential. Maintain a good mindset, do your proper work, and don't think about getting rich overnight. Exchanges just eat this up; being regulated and transparent is the way to go. This is how the crypto world should look, but it feels a bit ironic.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperervip
· 01-14 20:50
Basically, you need to have real substance; just shouting slogans is useless. If liquidity can't be stabilized, dreaming of listing tokens is just a fantasy. Forget about projects that have lost contact; these days, exchanges are very picky. Why are so many projects unaware of proper operational standards? Is it really that difficult? Looking good on-chain data and thinking about listing? That's naive. Compliance is truly a mandatory condition. Projects that don't understand this should reflect on themselves. By the way, how many projects have ultimately failed because of liquidity issues? It feels like listing requirements are much stricter now than before, which is actually good for project teams. Reliable projects aren't afraid of these requirements; it's those who are trying to fish in troubled waters that get panicked.
View OriginalReply0
GetRichLeekvip
· 01-14 20:45
Here we go again, just stabilize liquidity and you can get listed? How do I remember that the xxxxx project had huge liquidity, but in the end, it still suffered heavy losses... On-chain data looks good, but what's the use if there's no market maker willing to pump the price? Everyone talks about solid, standardized promotion, but after launching, they just take a cut and run. I've heard this excuse too many times. Official online presence is useless, with so many scammers in the crypto space, do you really think the exchange staff can tell them apart? Regulatory promotion... haha, let's wait and see how this indicator gets compromised.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleSurfervip
· 01-14 20:40
Basically, don't think about making a quick profit and then running away; exchanges are now very vigilant. Liquidity is really something to pay attention to, or else even the best coins are useless. It's both compliance and communication channels, a bunch of trouble, but that's the current game rules. Want to get listed? You have to present yourself properly. The ghosting tactic is really damn annoying; the official team should be available whenever called. It's not that hard to say, it all depends on whether the project team is willing to be honest and straightforward.
View OriginalReply0
NeonCollectorvip
· 01-14 20:31
It's the same old story. Frankly, exchanges are still using the same tricks; as long as the data looks good, that's all that matters. Genuine project teams have long understood this.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin