The controversy surrounding ZEC was already digested by the market in the early stages of the news. The key question now is: in the case of damage to the team's and project's reputation, what is the value support for this investment?

To use a simple analogy—if Master Kong's status and reputation as a brand are gone, and only a bowl of noodles remains, would you still pay the same price as Master Kong? The logic is the same. The price consensus of crypto assets ultimately depends on the project's market recognition and confidence foundation. When these fundamental elements waver, it becomes very difficult to sustain the previous valuation.

Market information is often directional. After the investigation concludes, ZEC is unlikely to experience a cliff-like drop, but in the long run, the project may face pressure to revert to its original levels. Investors need to reassess their confidence in this project and their reasons for holding.