In the previous cycle, visual models performed remarkably well. Gemini 3 Pro Vision dominated the field, achieving a +9.09% return, with three out of the top four spots occupied by visual-based models.
But this time, things are different. The market quickly proved us wrong — we didn't find any clear trend-based advantage. The market fluctuations and the unpredictable performance of the models directly wiped out the gains. Strategies that were once stable suddenly became ineffective.
The key insight is: a model's capability is not fixed. Sharp market volatility can directly impact their actual performance.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeNightmare
· 6h ago
It's the same story again. Last time, the visual model was hyped up, and this time it flopped. I knew it.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineNewbie
· 7h ago
Bro, last time the hype around the visual models really got out of hand, and this time we got hit hard. Kinda satisfying.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAO
· 7h ago
Damn, the Vision model was still being praised last week, and this week it’s exposed? When the market fluctuates, all strategies fail.
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmi
· 7h ago
Last week, they were still hyping Gemini Vision, and this week they’ve completely exposed their true colors. It’s hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walking
· 7h ago
Oh wow, is this the Vision model? It was just hyped up last week.
---
Another wave of rug pulls, the stable strategy disappeared just like that.
---
Market: I’m just watching you follow the trend.
---
It feels like all models are just acting; once the environment changes, they become unrecognizable.
---
What’s wrong with +9%? A single fluctuation gets completely wiped out, hilarious.
---
Probably just standard survivor bias; next cycle, they'll have a new favorite.
---
That’s why I never trust a single strategy; it’s too虚 (虚 means "虚" in Chinese, which can imply "虚" as in "虚假" meaning "fake" or "虚无" meaning "void/illusion").
In the previous cycle, visual models performed remarkably well. Gemini 3 Pro Vision dominated the field, achieving a +9.09% return, with three out of the top four spots occupied by visual-based models.
But this time, things are different. The market quickly proved us wrong — we didn't find any clear trend-based advantage. The market fluctuations and the unpredictable performance of the models directly wiped out the gains. Strategies that were once stable suddenly became ineffective.
The key insight is: a model's capability is not fixed. Sharp market volatility can directly impact their actual performance.