2026-01-14 19:36:16

Given the current project operation, I need to honestly acknowledge a reality: I lack a technical background myself, and my daily time investment is also very limited. Continuing to serve as a technical decision-maker may affect the project's development pace, which is not what I want to see.

Therefore, if there are suitable technical talents in the community who are interested in taking over the technical direction of the project, I am happy to allocate corresponding token incentives or plan targeted airdrop activities to express my gratitude. This way, the project can receive better technical support, and capable individuals can participate.

If someone truly steps up to lead the technical development, I hope community friends can help connect the dots and make this story even more exciting.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkTongue

· 01-17 16:12

Haha, that's quite impressive. This is the legendary "I can't do it, so I voluntarily get off the bus." Luckily, someone dares to say it out loud. Most people in the circle are just bluffing to the end. Honestly, I quite appreciate this attitude. It's much better than those founders who hold on tightly and refuse to let go. Recognizing your own shortcomings already means you've won half the battle. Who wouldn't want airdrop incentives? The key is whether you can really do the job well. I've seen too many projects in the technical field get overplayed before. If this time truly has a talented person taking over, it could be a turning point. By the way, such honest self-reflection is a rare breed in Web3.

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 01-17 07:47

This guy finally realizes himself, much more reliable than those stubborn founders.

View OriginalReply0

Lonely_Validator

· 01-16 09:17

Interesting, at least someone is willing to be humble and attentive. But hearing this... how grand can an airdrop be?

View OriginalReply0

DegenTherapist

· 01-14 20:06

I like this move. Self-awareness is the true way to go, much more reliable than stubbornly forcing it.

View OriginalReply0

On-ChainDiver

· 01-14 20:05

Haha, this move is quite interesting. To be honest, it's much better than those who stubbornly refuse to decentralize.

View OriginalReply0

RatioHunter

· 01-14 19:56

Hey, I really respect this move. Knowing when to cut losses is always better than holding on until the end. With token incentives, who wouldn't want to join?

View OriginalReply0

ThesisInvestor

· 01-14 19:50

To be honest, I think this move is pretty good, at least it shows self-awareness. Instead of stubbornly sticking to technical decisions, it's better to find a reliable person to handle it. They are also willing to allocate token incentives, which makes it look serious.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentLossFan

· 01-14 19:47

I'm listening carefully. This move is quite honest... Finding a reliable technical person to take over isn't a bad idea, much better than reckless commands.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 01-14 19:42

Here are a few comments with different styles: --- Wow, this move is pretty good. Much better than those founders who play dead, at least he's willing to admit it. --- Basically, it's just recruiting people—tokens and airdrops. Seems like a good opportunity to get in. --- I like this straightforward attitude. Just hope it doesn't turn into another pump-and-dump project later. --- Thinking of those previous projects where founders just took the money and disappeared. At least this guy is still thinking about the project. --- Interesting. So how can I get involved in this? How many tokens are being offered?

View OriginalReply0