2026-01-14 18:53:48

Among numerous blockchain projects, the depth of background resources often determines the project's development potential. Projects with strong resources in hand are more adept in ecosystem construction, compliance promotion, and market expansion. They can connect more quickly, gain policy friendliness, and are more likely to attract institutional attention and user trust. In contrast, resource-constrained teams, although technically proficient, often struggle during implementation and promotion phases. This is why some projects can grow steadily while others fall behind in competition.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GameFiCritic

· 21h ago

Background resources are indeed a quality lever, but isn't this argument a bit too absolute? I've seen many projects with abundant resources that end up failing in token deflation model design, leading to a complete collapse in player retention. Having strong technical skills combined with well-balanced incentives can sometimes sustain the product lifecycle better than just spending money and networking. The key still depends on ROI efficiency.

View OriginalReply0

ZKSherlock

· 23h ago

nah this is just saying rich guys win again... like, show me a project with solid cryptographic primitives that actually *needed* venture connections to succeed? tbh the whole "resources determine fate" narrative feels lazy. what about the fundamentals tho—trust assumptions, proof systems, actual security guarantees? those matter more than who you know imo

Reply0

MetaEggplant

· 01-14 19:23

Basically, it's about having money and connections to get things done. No matter how advanced the technology is, without resources, it's useless.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM