2026-01-14 17:49:35

Vanar's core competitiveness does not lie in promotional strategies.

Today, execution costs have dropped to rock-bottom levels, and there are countless options available. Where is the true dividing line? It’s in the level of intelligence, data persistence, and whether the system can operate stably.

Stateless agents cannot scale. Systems without memory cannot achieve compound effects. What we are seeing is precisely this direction—

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropworkerZhang

· 01-17 17:46

You're right, agents without memory can't go far --- That's why most projects are just paper tigers --- If you can't get persistent data storage right, everything else is worthless --- Costs went down but competition got fiercer instead—only what survives is the real deal --- Stateless? That's just a toy --- The key is stable operation; everything else is hot air --- Memory and compounding effects—that's the real competitive advantage --- Vanar gets this and that's enough --- A slight difference in intelligence level makes all the difference in the world

View OriginalReply0

BasementAlchemist

· 01-17 08:18

Sharpening the axe won't delay the work of chopping firewood. Vanar's approach isn't wrong, but how many can truly make the memory mechanism stable?

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMigrant

· 01-16 08:46

Well said, memory is the key to victory. --- Stateless? That's just decoration. I saw through it long ago. --- The cost volume has reached its limit. Now it's really about internal strength. Vanar has understood this well. --- The term compound interest effect is brilliant. Without memory, you really can't play it well. --- No matter how good the promotion is, it can't save poor technology. This time, someone finally explained it clearly. --- Stable operation... sounds easy, but actually doing it? Hehe. --- Data persistence is the real moat. It should have been valued long ago. --- An intelligent agent without memory is just like a walking corpse, indeed. --- So this is the confidence that allows Vanar to speak so frankly. The system is really stable.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyMiner

· 01-14 18:12

It sounds like money-burning agents can't really make a difference in climate change. Lack of memory indeed drags down performance, I agree on that. Ultimately, who survives depends on whose system is the most resilient.

View OriginalReply0

SchrödingersNode

· 01-14 18:10

You're right, the marketing tactics have been overused for a long time; the key still depends on technical strength. An intelligent agent with no memory is just a walking corpse; the compound interest effect is all an illusion. Vanar's approach is quite clear; let's see if it can truly stabilize in the future.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainNewbie

· 01-14 18:05

The cost floor is indeed established; now it's just a matter of who can create a memory effect. Intelligent agents without memory are truly paper tigers, that's certain. Stable operation is really a luxury; most end up failing. Vanar's approach is correct, but as for execution... we'll have to see what happens next. By the way, can stateful intelligent agents really scale? Honestly, I haven't seen it yet.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-74b10196

· 01-14 17:52

Bro is right, the current marketing strategies really have no competitive edge anymore. Data persistence is indeed the key; systems without memory can't really operate effectively. Only with memory and state can we achieve scale.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCry

· 01-14 17:50

Basically, technical strength is more important than just talking big, and I agree with that.

View OriginalReply0