2026-01-14 17:41:47

From a reputation perspective, some projects' practices are quite good and indeed have the meaning of learning from leading projects. However, to be honest, I don't see any real utility in this approach.

The key issue lies here: firstly, this is essentially a token discount sale based on users' affordability, in other words, a price tiering. Looking at the NFT side, the pricing logic becomes even more tenuous. Think about it, if the price of NFTs entirely depends on individual purchasing power, how can this model work?

Don't talk about innovation; such a design makes it difficult to find a healthy market equilibrium. From both the user perspective and the project's sustainability perspective, there are obvious logical flaws.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-9ad11037

· 01-16 17:56

Basically, it's the same old trick with a new coat of paint. The outdated pricing tier system is being forcefully pushed into innovation. I really don't understand how NFT pricing works—does it just depend on how fat the wallet is? If so, isn't that just pure money-grabbing? The logic is completely broken; there's no way to escape this model.

View OriginalReply0

PumpAnalyst

· 01-15 00:12

It's the same old trick of cutting leeks again after seeing through it, daring to boast about innovation just by changing the skin. *** This is a typical trap set by the market makers. Price layering, in simple terms, is just a fancy name for scalp trading. *** The technical aspect has already collapsed. The NFT pricing logic is completely untenable. Risk control alerts, brothers. *** Another pseudo-innovative project. I can tell from the K-line how this scheme is going to die. *** Honestly, the project team's tactics are too obvious. Sustainability? Don't even dream about it. *** Support levels are gone. This design can't find a market equilibrium point at all. The trend is set. *** Everyone, pay attention. This is the last window for cutting leeks. Don't get on board.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWanderingPoet

· 01-14 18:11

Basically, it's just a rebranded scam to fleece new investors, nothing new --- The tiered pricing model has been played out long ago, do they really think we can't see through it? --- NFT pricing entirely depends on purchasing power? How big does the logical loophole have to be to go live? --- Referencing top projects is just a nice way of saying copying and pasting --- Sustainability? Nonexistent. This kind of model will inevitably blow up someday --- I just want to ask, who would really pay for this scheme? --- To find a balance point, there must be real value first. Right now, it's all虚 --- Another pseudo-innovative project, next one

View OriginalReply0

0xLostKey

· 01-14 18:11

Basically, it's just a change of packaging without changing the medicine. The pricing tiering strategy has been a cliché for a long time. The NFT part is even more outrageous, completely based on personal preference. Where's the concept of a balance point?

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 01-14 18:06

Basically, it's just a shell game to scam quick profits, nothing new. NFT pricing following wallet size? Isn't that just a blatant wealth tax? Price stratification has been played out for a long time, and they still dare to call it innovation. It's a miracle if this model can run; it will collapse sooner or later.

View OriginalReply0

StakeOrRegret

· 01-14 18:03

Honestly, this is just a rebranded way to scam users; the layered pricing scheme is an old trick.

View OriginalReply0