Market reality: Fake $MIA tokens without creator endorsement have achieved a $5M market cap. Meanwhile, the genuine $MIAO project not only has creator backing but also allows creators to earn royalties, yet its market cap is only $100k. This inverted phenomenon is quite ironic. The market's pricing logic for project quality seems to be reversed—fraudulent projects hype and attract funds, while legitimate projects remain quiet. When will this valuation reversal turn around? Perhaps it's worth paying attention to the actual value support behind the projects rather than just following the hype.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropChaser
· 01-16 11:06
The market is so surreal; fake projects attract funds, while genuine ones are ignored. The difference is just too stark.
View OriginalReply0
SquidTeacher
· 01-14 18:03
This is the crypto world—it's outrageous.
Fake projects multiply a hundredfold, while legit ones get ignored. It's hilarious.
A crappy project like MIA can reach 5M, but MIAO is only 100k—really heartbreaking.
Hype is king; fundamentals are irrelevant.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 01-14 17:57
This is the true portrayal of the crypto world; falsehood has actually won.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainWinner
· 01-14 17:56
This is the magical realism of the crypto world: the fake ones achieve a $5M market cap, while the genuine ones are overlooked. It shows that people still prefer stories over value.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurDAOWatcher
· 01-14 17:41
This market is really crazy; fake projects are actually more popular. I don't understand.
Market reality: Fake $MIA tokens without creator endorsement have achieved a $5M market cap. Meanwhile, the genuine $MIAO project not only has creator backing but also allows creators to earn royalties, yet its market cap is only $100k. This inverted phenomenon is quite ironic. The market's pricing logic for project quality seems to be reversed—fraudulent projects hype and attract funds, while legitimate projects remain quiet. When will this valuation reversal turn around? Perhaps it's worth paying attention to the actual value support behind the projects rather than just following the hype.