From an investment standpoint, this pricing model actually tilts in favor of collectors and portfolio holders. The math is straightforward—unsealed variants come in cheaper, making entry points more accessible despite the inherent risk of tampering during handling and storage. That trade-off between affordability and authenticity concerns is the real tension here.
But here's where it gets interesting for the player side: they take the hit. Lower accessibility combined with authenticity concerns means less participation in the ecosystem.
Sealed boxes, though? They command a premium now. Why? Tamper-proof integrity becomes the asset itself. You're not just buying the product—you're buying the guarantee that what's inside remains exactly as intended. That peace of mind has its price tag, and the market clearly values it.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
IronHeadMiner
· 31m ago
Honestly, I wouldn't dare to buy unsealed at such a low price. The risk of counterfeit is too high... It's better to buy sealed honestly, spend a little more for peace of mind.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 5h ago
Basically, it's just a different name for the same old money-grabbing scheme. The premium on sealed boxes is so outrageous, does anyone really believe in the rhetoric of "integrity"? Players end up being repeatedly exploited in the end.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBrokenPromise
· 6h ago
Basically, it's just new tricks for cutting leeks. The sealed premium is so high that genuine players are actually being pushed out.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizard
· 01-14 17:58
Sealed is really a new rookie harvesting machine; with such an outrageous premium, people are still buying...
View OriginalReply0
faded_wojak.eth
· 01-14 17:58
The premium on sealed items is so outrageous... it really is just an IQ tax, collectors just love this set.
View OriginalReply0
FarmHopper
· 01-14 17:54
Well, basically it's just a scam to harvest retail investors. Is the premium on the sealed box really worth it...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatorFlash
· 01-14 17:53
Low-priced unopened items are indeed cheap, but have you calculated the liquidation risk? Once the damage certification becomes invalid, the collateralization ratio is directly triggered, which is a fatal flaw for lending positions.
View OriginalReply0
SingleForYears
· 01-14 17:42
Nah, this is a typical scam to fleece new investors. Cheap assets are actually riskier, and players get exploited even more.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_survivor
· 01-14 17:31
To be honest, this pricing logic is just a way to squeeze players for money, while collectors are having a great time... The premium on sealed boxes is so high, it feels a bit excessive.
From an investment standpoint, this pricing model actually tilts in favor of collectors and portfolio holders. The math is straightforward—unsealed variants come in cheaper, making entry points more accessible despite the inherent risk of tampering during handling and storage. That trade-off between affordability and authenticity concerns is the real tension here.
But here's where it gets interesting for the player side: they take the hit. Lower accessibility combined with authenticity concerns means less participation in the ecosystem.
Sealed boxes, though? They command a premium now. Why? Tamper-proof integrity becomes the asset itself. You're not just buying the product—you're buying the guarantee that what's inside remains exactly as intended. That peace of mind has its price tag, and the market clearly values it.