Investing in DUSK requires a different perspective—don't get caught up in short-term K-line movements. The core focus should be on its long-term story in the RWA track and institutional compliance.
To be honest, the positive signals are indeed there. The mainnet has been stable for over a year, with over 200 million tokens staked, which at least proves that the network infrastructure is solid. The partnership with licensed exchange NPEX is also a highlight—an €300 million securitized tokenization project. If it truly materializes, it means bringing real assets onto the blockchain on a large scale, which is a completely different level. The technical design for privacy and compliance also gives it some unique competitive advantages in this track.
But there are also many pitfalls. Whether the DuskEVM mainnet and Hedger components can perform stably in real trading is a tough test—it's not something that can be proven just by words. More importantly—can the NPEX project truly turn from a press release into verifiable on-chain trading volume and liquidity? This directly determines whether the business model can succeed. Another often overlooked issue is whether institutional funds will really flow into the Dusk network on a large scale, which depends on whether the ecosystem applications are rich enough and the user experience is good enough. No matter how hot the RWA sector is, without enough dApps and liquidity depth, institutions won't put real money into it.
Ultimately, DUSK faces a triple test of technical stability, ecosystem development progress, and market patience. The roadmap is clear, but whether it can deliver step by step is the key to its value.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaMaskVictim
· 23h ago
Good grief, it's the old routine of turning press releases into reality again... Trusting NPEX's 300 million euros is less reliable than trusting your own wallet.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreams
· 23h ago
No matter how popular the RWA concept becomes, it depends on whether the ecosystem can actually get off the ground. News releases alone are useless.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerGas
· 23h ago
In plain terms, the real test is whether that 300 million euros from NPEX will actually land.
Can real liquidity and press releases compare? That's the real gamble.
View OriginalReply0
GasWhisperer
· 23h ago
ngl the 3B euro NPEX story is just theater until we see actual on-chain volume... gas patterns don't lie but hype does
Reply0
SatoshiLeftOnRead
· 23h ago
No need to say more. If the NPEX 300 million euro project really comes to fruition, it would be amazing, but for now, it's just talk on paper.
Without a thriving ecosystem, institutional funds won't flow in. No matter how good the story is, it's all useless.
Let's wait and see if DuskEVM can withstand the pressure—that's the real test.
Honestly, it's still about delivery capability; anyone can boast.
Running stably for over a year does show some strength, but it's still far from enough.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHunter
· 23h ago
Sounds good, but when will the NPEX 300 million euro project actually go live on the chain? Press releases are easy, trading volume is the real deal.
Investing in DUSK requires a different perspective—don't get caught up in short-term K-line movements. The core focus should be on its long-term story in the RWA track and institutional compliance.
To be honest, the positive signals are indeed there. The mainnet has been stable for over a year, with over 200 million tokens staked, which at least proves that the network infrastructure is solid. The partnership with licensed exchange NPEX is also a highlight—an €300 million securitized tokenization project. If it truly materializes, it means bringing real assets onto the blockchain on a large scale, which is a completely different level. The technical design for privacy and compliance also gives it some unique competitive advantages in this track.
But there are also many pitfalls. Whether the DuskEVM mainnet and Hedger components can perform stably in real trading is a tough test—it's not something that can be proven just by words. More importantly—can the NPEX project truly turn from a press release into verifiable on-chain trading volume and liquidity? This directly determines whether the business model can succeed. Another often overlooked issue is whether institutional funds will really flow into the Dusk network on a large scale, which depends on whether the ecosystem applications are rich enough and the user experience is good enough. No matter how hot the RWA sector is, without enough dApps and liquidity depth, institutions won't put real money into it.
Ultimately, DUSK faces a triple test of technical stability, ecosystem development progress, and market patience. The roadmap is clear, but whether it can deliver step by step is the key to its value.