The battle for public blockchains is heating up, with everyone competing over TPS—Ethereum, Solana, Sui take turns showcasing their speed. But there's a problem no one seems to remember: fast speed is great, but where do you put the data?



That's why Walrus is so crucial. Many haven't realized that Web3 actually has two legs: one is computation (TPS), and the other is storage. Without either, you can't run.

Sui claims to be the Ferrari of blockchains, with transaction processing speeds soaring. But Ferraris have a natural flaw—the trunk is small. Want to run large games, train AI, store massive images and videos on-chain? Just upload them to the Sui mainnet? The costs might make you break out in cold sweat.

Walrus was born to solve this awkwardness. Simply put, it is a storage solution tailored for Sui by Mysten Labs. The core idea is straightforward: take large files out of the expensive consensus layer, and use erasure coding techniques to disperse storage across the network. The result is—PB-level data storage costs can be reduced to nearly negligible, while maintaining Sui's security and interoperability.

This approach is completely different from early storage projects like Filecoin. Filecoin solves the question of "can it be stored," but it’s more like a cold storage warehouse—slow to read. Walrus aims to make storage truly active—cheap to store and fast to use.

Honestly, this is the ultimate form of infrastructure.
ETH0,5%
SOL-1,02%
SUI-1,81%
FIL-2,43%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
InscriptionGrillervip
· 22h ago
Another "solution," how nice to say. What's the use of fast TPS? In the end, it still depends on storage to make a living. Who does Walrus want to harvest?
View OriginalReply0
quietly_stakingvip
· 01-17 08:46
Hmm... finally someone brought this up. Storage has indeed been collectively overlooked. Computing power has reached the ceiling, while storage is still sleepwalking. If this isn't addressed, problems will arise. Walrus's approach is truly brilliant, much more reliable than the cold and impersonal system of Filecoin.
View OriginalReply0
APY追逐者vip
· 01-14 17:54
Haha, you're right, speed doesn't matter. Data still has to be thrown somewhere. Walrus's approach is indeed brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_brokevip
· 01-14 17:52
Someone finally said it: just focusing on TPS is useless; if storage can't keep up, it's all just a castle in the air.
View OriginalReply0
ETHReserveBankvip
· 01-14 17:50
The analogy of a small trunk is brilliant; finally, someone has explained it thoroughly. Being fast is useless if there's nowhere to store things.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldminevip
· 01-14 17:49
The ROI of the storage layer has indeed been seriously underestimated. From the perspective of the computing network's logic, the cost curve of Walrus's erasure coding scheme is the real thing worth pursuing.
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflictvip
· 01-14 17:49
Haha, finally someone mentioned this. Storage is indeed a point that most people overlook. Walrus's approach of dispersed storage using erasure coding is really clever, but to be honest, the cold storage problem of Filecoin is not that easy to solve...
View OriginalReply0
LightningLadyvip
· 01-14 17:48
Hey, wait a minute. What's the use of just increasing TPS? Without a place to store data, it's like having nothing.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)