Founders with prior exits face a peculiar trap. Unless that last payday left them with something to prove—a chip on their shoulder—they tend to fold when things get tough. The grind loses its appeal once you've already made your FU money. Why suffer through another cycle?
Contrast that with the founder coming from nothing. They fight. They don't have the luxury of quitting. That scarcity? It's their engine. It keeps them moving when others are tempted to coast.
The question isn't really about skill or vision. It's about what you need, and what you're running from.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RealYieldWizard
· 10h ago
To be honest, that view is a bit too absolute... I've seen plenty of founders who've already achieved financial freedom work even harder, precisely because they don't have to worry about failure. The logic that "lack is what drives motivation" seems to oversimplify human nature.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 17h ago
That's so true. Founders who have exited are more likely to become complacent, really. Without that feeling of being pushed into a corner, there's no motivation to keep pushing forward.
View OriginalReply0
0xOverleveraged
· 01-14 17:50
Wow, rich people really find it easy to slack off. I feel like this is talking about my friend.
View OriginalReply0
BuyHighSellLow
· 01-14 17:46
To be honest, founders who have exited really have a fragile mindset of "proving themselves"... Once the comfort zone is established, the motivation is gone.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathoner
· 01-14 17:24
ngl this hits different when you zoom out on founder fundamentals. scarcity as an engine? that's literally the macro thesis for why early builders outpace the comfortable ones through market cycles. been watching this play out since the 2017 cycle—the ones who had something to prove always stack the best metrics by year 5.
Founders with prior exits face a peculiar trap. Unless that last payday left them with something to prove—a chip on their shoulder—they tend to fold when things get tough. The grind loses its appeal once you've already made your FU money. Why suffer through another cycle?
Contrast that with the founder coming from nothing. They fight. They don't have the luxury of quitting. That scarcity? It's their engine. It keeps them moving when others are tempted to coast.
The question isn't really about skill or vision. It's about what you need, and what you're running from.