2026-01-14 16:53:48

The Ethereum Gas fee issue has finally been seriously addressed. A team has just completed a $12 million funding round, focusing on developing a blockchain execution layer order book mechanism to transform the originally chaotic and disorganized Gas market into a predictable real-time execution experience.

The core innovation lies in introducing a dApp sponsorship model—applications within the ecosystem can proactively cover users' Gas costs while earning rebate incentives. In other words, your transaction costs are directly absorbed by the application layer. This logic breaks the passive burden of Gas fluctuations on users, turning the execution process from passive waiting into active optimization. For the user experience of the entire Ethereum ecosystem, this is not just a minor improvement but a paradigm shift.

ETH-0,58%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Blockchainiac

· 01-17 04:19

Wow, finally someone has figured out this longstanding problem of Gas fees. Spending $12 million is still worth it. dApp pay Gas? That logic is brilliant, basically the platform actively subsidizes the cost for you to enjoy, the wool comes from the sheep but users just need to feel comfortable. Honestly, I've been burned by Gas fees too many times before. I'm really looking forward to this being implemented. If this works out, the entire ecosystem's user experience will be significantly improved. But whether this team is reliable depends on what happens next. Let's observe and see.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 01-16 14:10

Really? Gas fees finally have a solution? But if dApp sponsorships become the new trend, will it just turn into another playground for the羊毛党... --- $12 million in funding sounds impressive, but the real key is whether it can be implemented effectively. --- Wait, will the application layer directly absorb Gas costs? That would make羊毛党们 really excited. --- Order book mechanisms sound high-end, but will it just be another round of hype... --- dApp sponsorship models sound good, but I'm worried it might just become a game for big players and project teams in the end. --- Finally, someone is taking it seriously. Let’s see if it can truly change the current situation. --- Gas issues are a long-standing topic. Can this time really break the deadlock? It feels a bit uncertain. --- Paradigm shift? Stop dreaming. Let’s wait until the mainnet is actually deployed before talking. --- Application bearing Gas? Then how does the rebate mechanism work? That’s probably just another new trick. --- This logic sounds pretty good at first, but I’m just worried it will end in failure again.

View OriginalReply0

Fren_Not_Food

· 01-15 19:57

Well, this really works now. I like the idea of dApp covering Gas fees for users. --- Wait, how does this sponsorship model ensure it won't be exploited? --- Finally, after being tortured by Gas fees for so long. --- Raising 12 million in funding for this direction—if it really gets implemented, that would be awesome. --- The order book mechanism sounds good, but I’m worried it’s just another PPT token. --- It's really comfortable that users don't have to worry about Gas fee fluctuations, but how do dApps absorb the costs? --- Damn, this is the Ethereum I want. --- The sponsorship model seems a bit too idealistic. Will real-world scenarios be this smooth? --- Finally, someone is seriously working to improve the experience. I knew there were complaints before. --- If I’m not mistaken, this is the ultimate solution to Gas fees.

View OriginalReply0

LucidSleepwalker

· 01-14 17:23

Uh, can dApp sponsorship really be implemented? Feels like another beautiful illusion. It should have been played like this a long time ago. How much did the Gas fee black hole swallow from me? It's interesting, but it depends on how long this thing can really last once it goes live. A 12 million funding round sounds pretty big, but I wonder if it will just become vaporware again. By the way, with this logic, would the application layer really be willing to "give away money" so proactively? That's a bit of a pipe dream. Finally, someone remembers us who went bankrupt because of Gas. It feels like trying to solve an unsolvable problem; ETH's problem is deeply rooted. If you ask me, instead of changing the Gas mechanism, it's better to jump directly to L2. This kind of solution sounds comfortable, but the reward incentives are probably a trap. Who's got that much money to give away? Order book plus dApp subsidies? Let's wait and see if anyone farms the sheep.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainUndercover

· 01-14 17:20

Wow, dApp sponsoring Gas? This is the right approach. No more being ripped off by gas fees. Finally, someone has figured this out. It should have been done this way long ago. If the gas fee issue is solved, the Ethereum ecosystem can really take off. I’m optimistic about this wave. Uh... wait, how exactly does this rebate incentive work? Could it become a new scenario for grazing羊毛? Instead of optimizing, it’s better to just burn it. What a pity. Raising 12 million to do this? Honestly, it’s a bit questionable. Hope it’s not another PPT project. My goodness, can the order book mechanism really stabilize Gas? I’m skeptical but also want to give it a try. I like this logic. Whoever bears the cost has the say. Much better than the current chaotic mess.

View OriginalReply0

VitalikFanAccount

· 01-14 17:16

Haha, finally someone is getting serious. The Gas fee issue has been dragging on for so long. Will dApp directly pay your Gas? Sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be empty talk. Will this $12 million in funding be wasted on marketing again... Being able to achieve predictive execution would be amazing, but with the Ethereum ecosystem, I’d only believe it if I see it. Is the order book model reliable? Could it actually increase complexity? Improving user experience is a good thing, but the key is whether it can be truly implemented. The sponsorship model is interesting, but I still don’t understand the logic of how dApps make money from it. Let’s wait and see, but at least this direction is correct.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 01-14 17:02

Finally, someone dares to solve the longstanding problem of Gas fees—dApp directly pays your Gas costs? This approach is quite innovative.

View OriginalReply0

SocialAnxietyStaker

· 01-14 16:59

Wait, will dApps really pay my Gas fees proactively? That sounds a bit too good to be true... When it actually lands, it might be a different story. $12 million in funding sounds pretty big, but can it really shake up Ethereum's current Gas ecosystem? It's hard to imagine. Honestly, I just want to know when I can start using it, not just funding news flying everywhere. This logic is indeed clever—applications earn rebates and can even cover my Gas... So how do they make money? In the end, the user still pays. They keep talking about paradigm shifts, said the same last time, and look what happened...

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 01-14 16:57

Wait, just 12 million USD can solve the Gas issue? Let me check the on-chain flow of this money... Sponsorship models sound good, but who guarantees that dApps will really pass the profits to users? It feels like in the end, it's just a new trick for big players to fleece users again.

View OriginalReply0

OvertimeSquid

· 01-14 16:56

Wow, now it's really getting intense. dApp directly covering my Gas? I love this logic. --- Finally, someone is serious. Throwing 12 million USD here to do some real work. --- Wait, dApp sponsoring Gas and getting rebates? Won't our users be just freeloading? --- This demon of Gas fees is finally going to be tamed. It was about time someone took action. --- Sounds good, but let's see the actual implementation. Don't let it be another empty promise. --- Paradigm shift? Don't get your hopes up yet. We need to see how long it can last. --- If transaction fees are directly eliminated this way, something feels off. --- Wow, if the application layer absorbs Gas costs, what about the profit margins for dApps? --- The order book mechanism sounds promising, but I'm worried it might just end up being another bunch of technical details that fade into obscurity.

View OriginalReply0