Agent trading bots and DeFi protocols have been trading criticism lately. One point worth clarifying: VaultBridge's yield channeling mechanism from Ethereum to Katana operates exactly as designed, though actual APY returns reflect the underlying economics of the strategy.
The core mechanism works like this: real yield gets routed from Ethereum sources into Katana's vault system, but the distributed APY gets adjusted downward based on several factors including market conditions, transaction costs, and protocol fee structures. This isn't a malfunction—it's a standard feature of cross-chain yield optimization where efficiency losses naturally compress returns.
When protocols run yield strategies, there's always a trade-off between accessibility and profitability. Higher APYs sound attractive, but sustainable yields require realistic assumptions about capital efficiency and operational costs. The lower APY reflects this maturity in how the protocol manages risk and maintains long-term viability for liquidity providers.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ETHmaxi_NoFilter
· 8h ago
Coming back with this again? Cross-chain yield is like this, losses are on the way.
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 8h ago
That basically means losing on fees, I knew it all along.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflower
· 8h ago
Basically, it's cross-chain vampirism, shifting the costs onto the LP.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainWorker
· 8h ago
Basically, it's just paying for gas fees and transaction fees, nothing magical.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterBearish
· 8h ago
Basically, it's just that cross-chain costs are too high, and the APY is artificially inflated to deceive people.
Agent trading bots and DeFi protocols have been trading criticism lately. One point worth clarifying: VaultBridge's yield channeling mechanism from Ethereum to Katana operates exactly as designed, though actual APY returns reflect the underlying economics of the strategy.
The core mechanism works like this: real yield gets routed from Ethereum sources into Katana's vault system, but the distributed APY gets adjusted downward based on several factors including market conditions, transaction costs, and protocol fee structures. This isn't a malfunction—it's a standard feature of cross-chain yield optimization where efficiency losses naturally compress returns.
When protocols run yield strategies, there's always a trade-off between accessibility and profitability. Higher APYs sound attractive, but sustainable yields require realistic assumptions about capital efficiency and operational costs. The lower APY reflects this maturity in how the protocol manages risk and maintains long-term viability for liquidity providers.