On nearly every blockchain, there's zero privacy. Your wallet balance, every transaction you make, everyone you interact with—it's all exposed. Completely transparent.
Sounds good in theory. But for real money management? It's a nightmare. Whether you're an institution moving capital or just a regular user managing your funds, having every financial move visible to the entire world isn't a feature. It's a vulnerability.
Think about it. You wouldn't broadcast your bank account balance and every purchase to strangers. Yet that's exactly what happens on most chains by default. The solution? Privacy-preserving protocols that let you transact without broadcasting your entire financial life.
It's not about hiding illegal activity. It's about basic financial hygiene.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseMigrant
· 01-17 13:29
Really, on-chain privacy has been seriously underestimated. It seems that most people haven't realized how dangerous this thing really is.
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddict
· 01-17 02:30
Really? The thing about everything being transparent on the public chain has been annoying for a long time. Who the hell wants the whole world to know what they're doing?
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 01-16 11:15
Someone should have said this earlier: lack of privacy on the chain is really a nightmare.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterNoLoss
· 01-14 14:12
Really, this is the point most people haven't thought of. On-chain transparency is a double-edged sword.
View OriginalReply0
NFTDreamer
· 01-14 14:09
This is the biggest irony of Web3: transparency has been touted as a benefit of decentralization, but in the end, it exposes each of us to the public.
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gains
· 01-14 14:05
Hmm, this is the real issue. It's more urgent than anything about decentralization.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMaster
· 01-14 14:04
Now I understand why institutions are afraid to go on the chain; privacy is really a major vulnerability.
View OriginalReply0
memecoin_therapy
· 01-14 13:52
Wow, constantly checking large account addresses is just ridiculous... Privacy really needs to be taken seriously.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 01-14 13:47
Transparency is truly a double-edged sword. Large transactions are thoroughly exposed. How can this work?
---
Privacy agreements must be taken seriously; otherwise, every move of the big players will be watched obsessively.
---
Basically, there needs to be some concealment; otherwise, on-chain transactions are no different from live streaming.
---
Financial hygiene? Sounds good, but can this system really be implemented in the crypto world?
---
Every transaction transparent—institutions would definitely go crazy. No one could stand it.
The Privacy Problem Most Overlook
On nearly every blockchain, there's zero privacy. Your wallet balance, every transaction you make, everyone you interact with—it's all exposed. Completely transparent.
Sounds good in theory. But for real money management? It's a nightmare. Whether you're an institution moving capital or just a regular user managing your funds, having every financial move visible to the entire world isn't a feature. It's a vulnerability.
Think about it. You wouldn't broadcast your bank account balance and every purchase to strangers. Yet that's exactly what happens on most chains by default. The solution? Privacy-preserving protocols that let you transact without broadcasting your entire financial life.
It's not about hiding illegal activity. It's about basic financial hygiene.