Many traditional companies want to embrace blockchain technology but are blocked by the three mountains of compliance, security, and system integration. Today, let's talk about how Walrus Protocol breaks through this dilemma.



First, the most painful part—compliance. Corporate data must follow regulations. Requirements like GDPR's "right to be forgotten" and data lifecycle management can be handled with centralized storage, but on-chain permanent storage hits a wall. Walrus uses programmable storage to solve this contradiction: smart contracts can automatically archive or delete data while maintaining a complete on-chain audit log. In other words, data is protected by regulations and has an immutable record. Permission management is more detailed—companies can set permissions hierarchically according to organizational structure, and who can see what data is dictated by on-chain contracts.

Next, security. Data is encrypted on your device, private keys never go online, and access permissions are controlled entirely by on-chain smart contracts—this is the zero-trust model. It’s also very flexible; sensitive data can be stored on public networks, while general data can be deployed through private gateways mixed with internal systems, without overturning existing IT infrastructure.

What’s most attractive is the cost. Direct storage costs can be reduced to 1%-5% of traditional solutions, and risks like centralized failures and vendor lock-in disappear.

In short, Walrus provides a visible path for companies that need data sovereignty, cost reduction, and compliance upgrades. If your company is also considering digital transformation, this solution is definitely worth exploring.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerGasvip
· 6h ago
Oh no, compliance + cost reduction by 95%? Sounds like another "perfect solution"... But why does it always fall a bit short when it actually gets implemented?
View OriginalReply0
RadioShackKnightvip
· 14h ago
Wow, can the cost be reduced to 1%-5%? Is this number serious? It feels a bit exaggerated.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleShadowvip
· 14h ago
Compliance + Security + Cost—this is the right way for enterprises to go on-chain.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHighvip
· 01-14 13:50
1% to 5% costs, sounds quite tempting, but is it really reliable to be this cheap? It feels a bit too idealized.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHerovip
· 01-14 13:40
Wait, can compliance truly be compatible with on-chain storage? I only believe it after real-world testing; on-paper data looks good.
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leakervip
· 01-14 13:38
Compliance is indeed a pain point, but Walrus's programmable storage sounds a bit idealistic. In reality, can it really automatically delete audit logs without issues?
View OriginalReply0
DataOnlookervip
· 01-14 13:34
1%-5% cost? That number sounds a bit dreamy. Can it really be sustained stably?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)