The liquidity issue of RIVER is indeed not to be underestimated. The project team holds the majority of the chips, and they can manipulate the price at will—either pushing up or crashing down—completely controlling the situation. Recently, it surged directly to $28, only to experience a sharp plunge afterward. In such market conditions, short-term trading is especially risky; funds entering are often trapped within an hour. Ultimately, the core problem is the extremely uneven distribution of chips, with retail investors having almost no say. Without genuine liquidity support, it relies entirely on market makers creating false volatility, and those who follow the trend always end up losing out.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RamenStacker
· 3h ago
It's the same old story, the big players are performing tricks, and we're just here watching the show.
---
That 28 yuan move, I knew something was off, and sure enough, it collapsed within an hour.
---
With the chips concentrated to this extent, what's the point of playing? Retail investors are just destined to be cut.
---
Such poor liquidity—why even touch RIVER? Deserved to be trapped.
---
That's why I only watch now and don't trade; there are too many of these scam coins.
---
Thinking about it still gives me chills; I almost jumped in too. Luckily, I held back.
---
The big players can dump whenever they want; we small retail investors are just sand coins.
---
Playing such coins in the short term is just asking for death; anything without real liquidity is the same.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGriller
· 3h ago
The dealer's tricks are the same old story, RIVER is really a textbook-level scene of cutting leeks
Retail investors just become the dish, don't even think about short-term trading, you'll be caught off guard and wiped out in an hour
With such concentrated chips, who dares to touch... unless you just want to take a gamble
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 3h ago
I watched that wave at 28 dollars surge and crash back down—this is a classic pump-and-dump scheme.
---
RIVER has long been off my list; the chips are too concentrated to play.
---
Retail investors really have no say in this kind of coin; once the funds go in, they’re just being harvested.
---
It must be so painful for those who followed the trend and bought in—got trapped within an hour.
---
The problem is that the liquidity is too fake, all just manipulators playing with themselves.
---
That fall from 28 has shattered many people's dreams.
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruant
· 3h ago
Typical sign of a rug pull, I didn't dare to chase the 28-dollar wave
---
Retail investors are just being cut here, what else is there to say
---
All the chips are in the hands of the project team, this trade can't be done
---
Getting trapped in an hour? Bro, you're lucky, some people can't even hold for 5 minutes
---
With such poor liquidity, you dare to list on the exchange, I'm truly stunned
---
RIVER is just a farmland, we're all leeks
---
I knew it was going to crash at 28 yuan, this rhythm is too obvious
---
No real trading depth, all fake with wash trading
---
Another old trick of uneven chips, will you come back next time?
View OriginalReply0
bridgeOops
· 3h ago
The $28 wave directly cut my losses, I went in and never came out.
The liquidity issue of RIVER is indeed not to be underestimated. The project team holds the majority of the chips, and they can manipulate the price at will—either pushing up or crashing down—completely controlling the situation. Recently, it surged directly to $28, only to experience a sharp plunge afterward. In such market conditions, short-term trading is especially risky; funds entering are often trapped within an hour. Ultimately, the core problem is the extremely uneven distribution of chips, with retail investors having almost no say. Without genuine liquidity support, it relies entirely on market makers creating false volatility, and those who follow the trend always end up losing out.