Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
Trade global traditional assets with USDT in one place
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Participate in events to win generous rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and enjoy airdrop rewards!
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investment
Simple Earn
Earn interests with idle tokens
Auto-Invest
Auto-invest on a regular basis
Dual Investment
Buy low and sell high to take profits from price fluctuations
Soft Staking
Earn rewards with flexible staking
Crypto Loan
0 Fees
Pledge one crypto to borrow another
Lending Center
One-stop lending hub
VIP Wealth Hub
Customized wealth management empowers your assets growth
Private Wealth Management
Customized asset management to grow your digital assets
Quant Fund
Top asset management team helps you profit without hassle
Staking
Stake cryptos to earn in PoS products
Smart Leverage
New
No forced liquidation before maturity, worry-free leveraged gains
GUSD Minting
Use USDT/USDC to mint GUSD for treasury-level yields
Galaxy Digital Compares Proposed Senate Crypto Bill's Surveillance Powers to PATRIOT Act
Source: CoinEdition Original Title: Galaxy Compares Crypto Bill DeFi Rules to Patriot Act Powers Original Link: Galaxy Digital Research has issued an alert regarding proposed Senate cryptocurrency legislation, characterizing Treasury Department surveillance provisions as comparable to the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001. Alex Thorn, head of company-wide research at Galaxy Digital, stated the draft under Senate Banking Committee review would constitute “the single largest expansion of financial surveillance powers since the USA PATRIOT Act.”
The analysis has generated discussion among lawmakers, industry participants, and regulatory advocates as legislative negotiations continue over the market structure bill. The research identifies three provisions granting the U.S. Treasury Department authority over digital asset transactions that raise concerns about judicial oversight.
Provisions Expand Government Transaction Control
The draft establishes “temporary hold” authority that enables the Treasury to pause digital asset transactions upon police requests, with a legal safe harbor for compliant companies. This bypasses traditional judicial oversight requirements governing similar actions in conventional banking systems.
The bill extends “special measure” powers targeting digital currencies and decentralized finance platforms. This creates mechanisms for transaction freezes without court orders. This authority was previously unavailable under existing financial surveillance frameworks.
Distributed ledger application layer regulation explicitly establishes mandatory Treasury clarification of sanctions and anti-money laundering obligations for interfaces operating within the United States. This provision extends surveillance requirements to non-custodial protocols.
Thorn’s comparison to the PATRIOT Act carries weight, given that the 2001 legislation substantially widened federal surveillance capabilities following the September 11 attacks. Galaxy contends the proposed crypto bill exceeds those post-9/11 measures by applying surveillance mechanisms to emerging financial infrastructure without corresponding privacy protections or judicial oversight.
Senators Weigh Surveillance Powers and Crypto Innovation
Senator Tim Scott chairs the Senate Banking Committee and drives the bill forward as the primary architect. Committee markup is scheduled for January 15, 2026. Scott announced plans for a January 15 vote, with passage requiring 60 Senate votes, necessitating support from 7-10 Democratic senators, given the current 53-47 Republican majority.
Senator Elizabeth Warren has stood up as the leading Democratic voice expressing concerns about DeFi surveillance and Trump administration officials’ personal financial interests in cryptocurrency. Warren requested investigations into decentralized exchanges like certain DEX platforms and questioned whether the Trump administration appropriately addresses national security risks.
Senators Jack Reed, Tina Smith, and Chris Van Hollen expressed concerns, requesting hearings before the markup to discuss implications. Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden introduced standalone legislation, the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, establishing federal standards protecting non-custodial developers from money transmitter regulations.
Lummis emphasized that “writing code is not the same as controlling money.” She also added that developers maintaining open-source infrastructure should not face prosecution for activities that do not constitute money laundering risks.