#数字资产市场动态 A quantitative fund founder recently shared a viewpoint: retail investors are not that important in the recovery of the crypto market. Comparing it to gold makes it clear— the gold market size is more than ten times that of Bitcoin, but the driving force behind gold prices has always been large institutional funds. The same applies to Bitcoin; the real push comes from the continuous influx of institutional capital.
Although this argument is about Bitcoin, when reflected onto the future trajectory of the entire crypto ecosystem, it actually reveals several underlying principles that cannot be ignored.
**The game has changed**. Projects that can survive and grow in the next cycle must pass rigorous due diligence by top-tier institutions in terms of narrative, information transparency, and fundamentals. Relying solely on "community culture" or "hype speculation" is no longer viable. True competitiveness is reflected in: the coordination ability of a global volunteer network, verifiable actual results reflected on the chain, and collaborations with real institutions. Only by integrating these elements can they appeal to institutions that focus on social impact investing.
**The key is to eliminate "uncertainty"**. For ecosystem projects, the greatest risk is not technical issues but a trust crisis over whether the "narrative can truly be realized." The most compelling proof is ensuring that every offline event, every flow of materials, and every new user has an auditable record off-chain. Transparency to the extreme is necessary so that institutions' doubts about your "long-term value" can truly dissipate.
**Positioning needs an upgrade**. In the asset allocation framework of institutions, besides inflation-hedging "digital gold" ($BTC) and yield-generating "digital oil" ($ETH), there is also a need for a category of "digital public welfare assets" that can create positive social effects. For institutions, this type of asset provides moral certainty—investing with social value—and execution certainty—commitments that can be realized. Whoever becomes the preferred and benchmark player in this track will hold the key to the next era of institutional allocation logic.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedThrice
· 01-17 12:12
Basically, retail investors have been abandoned, and this kind of rhetoric is just annoying.
Here comes another round of the "institutional allocation" hype, just like last year at this time.
I believed in the transparent audit approach, but how many projects have actually implemented it? Seems like not many.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy
· 01-15 17:29
To be honest, it's been clear for a long time that retail investors are marginalized; it's not something I just realized today.
This logic is actually just "big funds have the say," nothing new at all.
If you ask me, those projects that hype up "community culture" really need to wake up; without institutional backing, they can't sustain.
Transparency is a good idea, but the real question is, how many projects are truly willing to open their books?
The concept of "digital public welfare assets" sounds a bit like putting old wine in a new bottle...
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66
· 01-14 13:01
Retail investors get slapped in the face, institutions take over. This logic sounds so familiar to me... It should have been like this a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 01-14 13:00
Is the signal of retail investors being wiped out this obvious? I really can't hold it anymore.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 01-14 12:55
Retail investors are not that important? That's laughable, it sounds like institutions are just building their own confidence...
Wait, regarding transparency, are there really projects that can achieve that? Or is this just another new narrative tactic?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 01-14 12:53
Basically, retail investors need to wake up. Without institutional backing in this round, don't expect a turnaround.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingToReadDocs
· 01-14 12:45
Are retail investors being kicked out? That's hilarious, we've known this trick for a long time.
It's the same old "institutions are king" narrative... as if retail investors can really change anything. Transparent audits, social value, long-term commitments—these all sound just like a fundraising PPT.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkeptic
· 01-14 12:44
It's true that retail investors being sentenced to death is a complete disaster, but to be honest, this logic isn't new... If institutions enter the market, they must undergo transparent audits. Isn't that selling out the original intention of Web3's anti-centralization ethos? Do we really have to obediently accept being scrutinized by institutions?
#数字资产市场动态 A quantitative fund founder recently shared a viewpoint: retail investors are not that important in the recovery of the crypto market. Comparing it to gold makes it clear— the gold market size is more than ten times that of Bitcoin, but the driving force behind gold prices has always been large institutional funds. The same applies to Bitcoin; the real push comes from the continuous influx of institutional capital.
Although this argument is about Bitcoin, when reflected onto the future trajectory of the entire crypto ecosystem, it actually reveals several underlying principles that cannot be ignored.
**The game has changed**. Projects that can survive and grow in the next cycle must pass rigorous due diligence by top-tier institutions in terms of narrative, information transparency, and fundamentals. Relying solely on "community culture" or "hype speculation" is no longer viable. True competitiveness is reflected in: the coordination ability of a global volunteer network, verifiable actual results reflected on the chain, and collaborations with real institutions. Only by integrating these elements can they appeal to institutions that focus on social impact investing.
**The key is to eliminate "uncertainty"**. For ecosystem projects, the greatest risk is not technical issues but a trust crisis over whether the "narrative can truly be realized." The most compelling proof is ensuring that every offline event, every flow of materials, and every new user has an auditable record off-chain. Transparency to the extreme is necessary so that institutions' doubts about your "long-term value" can truly dissipate.
**Positioning needs an upgrade**. In the asset allocation framework of institutions, besides inflation-hedging "digital gold" ($BTC) and yield-generating "digital oil" ($ETH), there is also a need for a category of "digital public welfare assets" that can create positive social effects. For institutions, this type of asset provides moral certainty—investing with social value—and execution certainty—commitments that can be realized. Whoever becomes the preferred and benchmark player in this track will hold the key to the next era of institutional allocation logic.