Super Instructions keeps the bytecode untouched—that's the clever part. What happens next is where the magic lives: when the client runs the code, it scans for recurring opcode patterns and consolidates them into a single optimized instruction.
Take SI_PUSH_PUSH_ADD as an example. Instead of executing three separate operations, the runtime bundles them together. The end result? Identical outcomes, identical gas accounting. The real win is cutting down the interpreter steps—fewer cycles, same guarantees.
It's subtle but effective optimization at the execution layer.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractPhobia
· 01-17 05:47
Wow, this optimization idea is brilliant. Combining three operations into one... not only saving gas but also reducing cycle count. This is the kind of clever trick that smart people come up with.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCat
· 01-16 09:04
Oh wow, this is the kind of elegance I was talking about—no need to change the bytecode, just do the work at runtime.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanboy42
· 01-16 06:10
Yes, this is the optimization method I love: keeping the bytecode unchanged while secretly optimizing at the runtime level. Very clever!
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlacker
· 01-14 11:55
Wait, so this thing just merges duplicate operation codes? How about the performance improvement? Is it really that amazing?
View OriginalReply0
ApeEscapeArtist
· 01-14 11:52
This optimization idea is indeed excellent—bundling repetitive operations into a single command... The key to saving gas still depends on reducing the number of loop steps.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 01-14 11:45
Oh, so these are super instructions, huh? It sounds like bundling repetitive opcodes together... A handy trick to save gas indeed.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 01-14 11:44
Hey, this idea is quite interesting. Packaging repetitive opcode patterns into a single instruction seems like a clever approach. But the real question is, how does it perform in practice?
View OriginalReply0
UncleLiquidation
· 01-14 11:44
ngl this is exactly what I wanted to see, bundling repetitive operations into a single command... saving gas without changing the logic, this is true optimization, not some flashy gimmick.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 01-14 11:39
Basically, it's just packaging repetitive operations, not very complicated, but it can indeed save gas.
Super Instructions keeps the bytecode untouched—that's the clever part. What happens next is where the magic lives: when the client runs the code, it scans for recurring opcode patterns and consolidates them into a single optimized instruction.
Take SI_PUSH_PUSH_ADD as an example. Instead of executing three separate operations, the runtime bundles them together. The end result? Identical outcomes, identical gas accounting. The real win is cutting down the interpreter steps—fewer cycles, same guarantees.
It's subtle but effective optimization at the execution layer.