「2000万波段猎手」加仓空单踩雷，1小时浮亏115万美元

HashBard

2026-01-14 07:34:18

【区块律动】链上数据显示，绰号「2000万波段猎手」的交易地址（0x880a）又开始动作了。1月14日过去一小时内，这位激进型交易者连续加仓BTC、LTC空单，还押上了HYPE的空头头寸。结果不太理想——浮亏直接扎到了115万美元。

这个账户的风格相当激进，喜欢拿高杠杆做短线搏杀，历史表现也确实能打：全周期下来累计盈利9049万美元。只不过这一波显然没踩对节奏，账户在红区里晃悠。

BTC0,44%

LTC0,58%

HYPE3,86%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainUndercover

· 01-17 04:50

Damn, did we crash again this time? Even the 20 million hunters have their day, huh Adding to short positions still depends on luck; when it’s gone, it’s gone at 1.15 million No matter how impressive the history, a wave of retracement can come back quickly This is the fate of high leverage, exciting but risky

View OriginalReply0

ContractTester

· 01-14 23:56

High leverage adds to a short position and suffers a huge loss of 1.15 million in one hour. This rhythm is indeed off track; I need to take a big loss to learn a lesson. --- An account with a profit of 90 million also has its crashes. The market is so ruthless; even swing traders have to admit defeat. --- Continuously adding to BTC, LTC, and HYPE short positions, going all in at once. This courage is truly remarkable, but the price is a bit painful. --- Saying 1.15 million USD is gone just like that, the joy of high leverage comes quickly and leaves just as fast. --- This guy has a good historical record, but this time he clearly predicted wrong. The market never shows mercy. --- Watching the account fluctuate in the red zone, that feeling is probably not very pleasant. Adding to short positions only accelerates the losses. --- Aggressive trading is like this. Yesterday still making money, but within an hour, I plunged in with 1.15 million. Luck plays a big role. --- Thinking I was in the right rhythm, but the market just reversed when I did. This is the price of high leverage. --- Another moment of market education. Even a profit of 90 million can't prevent this wave of bloodshed.

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_resilient

· 01-14 13:09

The short position was fully committed, and he's still daring to add more. This guy is really tough. Winning over 90 million just disappeared like that; he needs to work on his rhythm. 1.15 million per hour, how long will it take to recover the losses? Haha. Even the swing traders have their failures; will they be more aggressive next time? Oh my god, another misstep. It's really exciting that this account is still alive.

View OriginalReply0

DaisyUnicorn

· 01-14 08:02

Oh no, this round of short positions adding to the position directly backfired, turning $1,150,000 into a bubble. Even the flowers are wilting, boohoo.

View OriginalReply0

DegenApeSurfer

· 01-14 08:02

Lost again? This guy made over 90 million from history, feeling like a wave of returns is coming back haha --- $1.15 million was gone in just one hour, is this the joy of high leverage --- Adding to short positions? Brother, you're really tough, this wave of BTC rhythm is indeed unpredictable --- Making quick gains and losing just as fast, sometimes it feels like just throwing a tantrum --- Alright, the swing trader made a mistake, the next turnaround battle is still nowhere in sight --- His account's historical performance is right there, a big loss is nothing, just see how he turns it around --- Using high leverage for short-term trading definitely gives a rush, but the cost... it hurts a bit --- So, no matter how much you earn, you can't withstand a big explosion

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM

· 01-14 07:59

A short position wiped out in one shot, 1.15 million evaporated directly. This guy's luck today is really incredible. Adding positions to turn the tide? I think he's just giving money to the exchange. Made over 90 million, so how did he lose to a wave of market movement? A swing trader turning into a swing buyer. Leverage and short positions again—this trading style can be summed up in two words—刺激 (刺激 means "exciting" or "thrilling"). Unfortunately, the thrill was too much. Even a glorious historical record is useless; the market turns and immediately brings you back to square one.

View OriginalReply0

HashRatePhilosopher

· 01-14 07:58

A full go on a short position, now I've really been proven wrong. --- Adding to the position and getting wrecked again, this guy's guts are really bold. --- Nine million in profit instantly evaporated over a million, this move definitely missed the mark. --- High leverage trading is like this—profits come quickly, losses come just as fast. --- Adding to a short position in this market is truly a gamble with your life. --- It seems the swing trader really hit a landmine this time. --- An unrealized loss of 1.15 million in one hour—how calm do you have to be to keep trading? --- This account's history can be used as a weapon, but this time I made a basic mistake. --- Wandering in the red zone, waiting to break free? Or just closing the position directly? --- Using 90 million in profit to gamble on this move—whether it's worth it or not is a question.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleMistaker

· 01-14 07:37

A $1.15 million unrealized loss, this guy definitely didn't hit the right spot this time --- Over 90 million in profit, gone just like that. Even swing traders have to face setbacks --- Adding to short positions and getting slapped in the face, this rhythm really wasn't well grasped --- High leverage trading like this, losing over a million dollars in an hour is truly the end --- Watching the account fluctuate in the red zone, this feeling is probably hard to bear --- Being a legendary bull doesn't change the fact of today's losses --- Continuously adding to positions actually accelerates the loss, there's something to learn here --- Aggressive style facing a reverse market, straight to GG --- This round of operations was truly paying tuition with a profit of 90 million --- BTC, LTC, HYPE all shorted together, and all failed? Embarrassing

View OriginalReply0