2026-01-14 07:25:48

Recently, I read opinions from several industry heavyweights about the future of Bitcoin and found that their views are surprisingly divergent—some mention $1.5 million, others predict $13 million. This far exceeds rational analysis and resembles more a battle of beliefs.

Let's start with the more optimistic camp. The head of a leading public chain foundation believes that by 2026, Bitcoin could reach $1.33 million. He even mentioned that in the case of an extreme market trend (which he calls "Omega Candle"), a rapid surge could occur in a short period. On the other hand, the leader of a well-known asset management firm provided a phased forecast—under a baseline scenario, Bitcoin might reach around $600,000 by 2030, but in a bull market scenario, it could surge to $1.5 million. Her logic is quite interesting: after the approval of a US spot ETF, institutional allocations will accelerate. As long as institutions allocate 5% of their assets to digital assets like Bitcoin, prices could be driven significantly higher.

A more aggressive voice comes from the head of a publicly listed company. He directly stated that Bitcoin is currently in the "Gold Rush" mid-term (2024-2034), with a mid-term target of $150,000 to $250,000, and a long-term target that surprisingly reaches $13 million, aiming for 2045. The core logic of this big player is that Bitcoin's supply is fixed, and macro liquidity is abundant, so the long-term ceiling could be much higher than most people imagine.

In essence, this is no longer just technical analysis or data-driven inference. Everyone is using their own framework to understand Bitcoin's value—from its positioning as digital gold, macro asset allocation, to extreme scenario assumptions—completely different perspectives, and naturally, the conclusions vary greatly.

BTC0,8%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

VibesOverCharts

· 01-16 03:53

$13 million? Is this guy writing a science fiction novel? It cracks me up. --- Honestly, these predictions are just storytelling; whoever's story can better fool people into investing wins. --- Omega candles? Sounds very metaphysical. Honestly, I have no idea either. --- Institutions allocating 5% to take off? Why not allocate now? That logic has a big flaw. --- Calling for $13 million in 2045... Are you laying the groundwork for your own retirement plan? --- Anyway, I trust those who are actually putting real money into it, not just talking. --- Mid-stage gold rush? Fixed supply and ample liquidity? This kind of explanation sounds just like万能胶 (super glue). --- Forget it, don't believe these. Doing your own research is the most important. --- Among all predictions, I only believe in the logic of institutional allocation; the rest are just faith-based recharges. --- Really, every big shot is like drawing a pie, but some pies are actually landing.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletAnxiety

· 01-15 14:03

It's just another bunch of number games. At the end of the day, everyone is just telling their own story. 13 million USD? What did this guy take... I agree with the logic of institutions allocating 5%, but if it can really be implemented, that would be surprising. Faith versus confrontation, to put it nicely, is called prediction; to put it bluntly, it's all gambling. "Omega candles" sound ridiculous; just giving it a conceptual label makes it seem professional. Wait a minute, there's a galaxy gap between 1.5 million and 13 million.

View OriginalReply0

OfflineNewbie

· 01-14 12:57

This price prediction is so off, might as well just roll the dice. 13 million USD? Bro, are you writing a science fiction novel? The term "Omega Candle" sounds so impressive, but it's just luck-based gambling. Institutional 5% allocation can make it rise so much? I don't believe you, I'll cut my losses first. The big shots each say their piece, and us retail investors just wait to be cut like chives, haha. Faith versus confrontation? Basically, whoever has more chips gets to call the shots. The gap between 1.5 million and 13 million, that's several times over, who dares to think? That's why I only dare to play with pocket money, the "framework" of you big shots, I can't afford to play.

View OriginalReply0

NewDAOdreamer

· 01-14 07:55

$13 million? Just believe in top-up, this guy treats macro liquidity like a printing press. Here we go again, every time it's the same logic—fixed supply can only go to the moon? Then why hasn't gold gone to the sky? Omega candles haha, sounds more fantastic than technical analysis. I bet five bucks this term is purely made up. Institutions only need to allocate 5% to lift the price? Then by now, it should have already broken through 2 million since 2020. Why are they still bragging here? Real thoughts: these people are all taking sides within their own circles. The more outrageous the prediction, the more fame they get. This routine is old. No matter how nicely it's said, one thing can't be changed: no one really knows how big the actual demand is.

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_watcher

· 01-14 07:54

$13 million? Buddy, this isn't analysis, it's writing science fiction. --- I just want to ask, will institutions really throw in 5%? Or is everyone just hyping themselves up? --- "Omega candles" sound pretty intimidating, but it's just intensified gambling. --- Anyway, it's all about faith; data has long been useless haha. --- The gap between $1.5 million and $13 million is roughly the same as Bitcoin's own range. --- Everyone has their own "framework," in other words, everyone is dreaming their own dream. --- If the supply is fixed, it can reach 13 million? Then gold should have broken a million long ago. --- What is the current price? Forgot, but listening to these predictions just makes me feel skeptical. --- The gold rush forecasted until 2045, this guy really dares to think. --- The funny thing is, I heard all these words three years ago, and then?

View OriginalReply0

WenAirdrop

· 01-14 07:52

$13 million? Is this guy trying to make us all rich or what... --- I really laughed at the number 13 million. To put it nicely, it's faith; to be harsh, it's stubbornness. --- So who should we believe? How can these big shots have such a wide range of opinions? --- A 5% allocation by institutions can push it to 1.5 million? That's a pretty optimistic idea. --- Honestly, this is a faith game. Whoever's vision is the most appealing wins. --- From 1.33 million to 13 million, there's a whole 🌌 gap in between, brother. --- Midway through the gold rush, calling for 13 million—those are some daring thoughts. --- These people are just each taking sides and telling stories; the data is just decoration. --- I can still believe in 1.5 million, but 13 million is a bit out there, isn't it? --- Everyone is fooling with their own frameworks. I'm just waiting to see whose story attracts the most institutions. --- Fixed supply plus ample liquidity = unlimited ceiling? That logic is a bit forced.

View OriginalReply0

DataChief

· 01-14 07:52

Haha, this is the faith price, anyway it's all just storytelling. --- $13 million? Bro, are you writing a science fiction novel? --- In the end, everyone is just talking past each other; no one really dares to go all in on their predictions. --- The name Omega Candle is just ridiculous, sounds like it's to fulfill someone's fantasy. --- A 5% allocation by institutions can take off? I think it also depends on how the liquidity looks. --- Their prediction ranges are really outrageous, almost like self-soothing for gamblers. --- Anyway, this thing ultimately depends on macro policies and capital flow; predictions are just armchair quarterbacks. --- Long-term $13 million, what kind of currency devaluation would that require? That logic is a bit unreasonable. --- If I had to choose between $150,000 and $1.3 million, I’d go with the middle ground. --- So in the end, no one is really confident; everyone is just sticking to their own story framework.

View OriginalReply0

DefiSecurityGuard

· 01-14 07:46

ngl this is just hopium dressed up as analysis... 1.3M btc in 2045? that's some serious cope energy right there. classic pattern—layer enough institutional buzzwords over speculation and suddenly it sounds legit lmao

Reply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 01-14 07:45

13 million? This guy must be drunk. I bet five Dogecoins he can't even figure out how this number came about. 1.5 million to 13 million, this range could span the entire multiverse, just talking nonsense. "Omega Candle," haha, another new term to trick us into buying? I'm already tired of this routine. It's called faith in the best case, but essentially everyone is just talking past each other; no one has the right answer. Institutions only need to allocate 5% to take off? Then why are they still cutting our leeks in 2023? The logic from 13 million to 2045 is stretchable, but I only look at 2025—that's the real test. Honestly, these big shots are just looking for backing for their holdings. Don't cry when they get proven wrong. "Mid-term Gold Rush," probably just mining retail investors' money, haha.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 01-14 07:37

$13 million? Haha, isn't this just a pipe dream? It feels like these people are playing with numbers. To be honest, I can buy the logic of institutions allocating 5%, but $13 million is really outrageous. These big shots are each doing their own thing, it seems like they're all just telling stories. Fixed supply + ample liquidity? Then what resistance is left? It still feels like a gamble on faith. 1.33 million vs. 13 million, the gap is so huge it's ridiculous. Who the hell knows who to believe? Omega candles sound pretty intimidating, just huge surges and crashes. What kind of terminology is that? I just want to know which big shot's prediction will end up eating their own words.

View OriginalReply0