3350 broke through, so the plan is to move within the 3285-3385 range with three trades. Currently, the first trade is in progress, then we go to test 3385, and then drop back to 3285.

For short-term traders, enter here: short position with a stop loss at 3455; for long positions, stop loss at 3225.
This morning, short at 3280 with a target of 3285 (this is the first trade, which you all didn't do).
Then there will be a long at 3285, with a target of 3385 (this is the second trade).
And there's a short for the third trade!
Every time we place an order, try to keep the same position size. From a technical perspective, there's never a single technical pattern. Today, the probability that 1+1=2 is 80%. When you use this same technique tomorrow, the probability that 1+1=2 becomes 99%. The same technical, the result is always the same: 1+1=2, it will always equal 2.
If you make a long at 3285 and earn a little, after taking profit, when you go short at 3385, you still add a little position. Don’t think that because the previous long was profitable, the probability of winning the next short is higher than losing.
This leads to a chain problem: the signals given by the uncles, grandpas, and grandmas in your live room, I trade with 1% of your capital. If you keep earning and earning and keep being awesome, then after multiplying your capital by 1% N times, the last losing trade will always be bigger than the profits of the previous trades.
Alright! You might not understand what N times means. Basically, this 🐶🐔 market, tell me why two days ago at 3150/3180 you all shorted, but when it broke through yesterday, you didn't short, and instead left me alone in the wind, confused? I was the only one short at 3180. Every time I get beaten up, it’s me. Am I Japanese or something?