2026-01-14 06:21:07

FOGO airdrop has finally landed. Cross-chain users are seeing decent benefits, everyone who crosses over gets a share. A lot of tokens were also distributed for the fishing LP, and participation has been quite high. However, the Yapper community didn't set up a separate airdrop eligibility. On the other hand, users with lilfogees WL received 10,000 tokens, which shows a clear bias.

But I just can't quite understand. I invested a considerable amount of time and effort into fishing, and I have quite a bit of fishing data as well. Why am I not eligible for the fishing airdrop? The distribution logic is indeed a bit confusing. I'm not sure if it's an issue with the statistical criteria or if the participation requirements are particularly strict. It seems I need to pay more attention to the project's specific rules and explanations.

FOGO-12,61%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BuyTheTop

· 01-17 06:20

Why are the restrictions so strict? Even phishing attempts are getting caught, it feels like a benefit for WL users.

View OriginalReply0

OfflineNewbie

· 01-17 06:15

This allocation logic is really confusing. How is it that after investing so much effort, we are excluded? It feels like there's no transparent and open algorithm.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractWorker

· 01-14 08:18

It's funny, spending so much effort fishing and not even qualifying, this is the magic of Web3.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 01-14 06:49

This airdrop rule design indeed has some issues, it feels like it was decided hastily after the fact... Let's look at the data. WL users get 10,000 tokens alone, while other participants share the rest, which clearly has a bias mathematically. Your fishing costs and participation rates are not included in the statistics, and the problem might lie in the project's snapshot logic... Further verification is needed to identify which chain's fishing data was not recognized.

View OriginalReply0

defi_detective

· 01-14 06:48

Invest so much in phishing, and you end up not qualifying for the airdrop? That logic is really clever, feels like being subtly hinted by the project team...

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-14 06:45

Based on on-chain data, the eligibility criteria for this airdrop indeed warrant in-depth analysis. Lilfogees WL's allocation of 10,000 tokens with this skewed ratio, when calculated based on participation rate, suggests that the weight of ordinary phishing users may have been severely undervalued.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOrektGuy

· 01-14 06:43

This airdrop distribution is indeed a bit skewed; WL participants make huge profits, while phishing attempts are marginalized.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityOracle

· 01-14 06:39

Feels like I got shafted. I put so much effort into fishing, and I get nothing? This distribution is really outrageous. WL users get directly 10,000, what about others? The participation requirements are so strict, it's really unbelievable. Next time, I need to carefully check the project team's rules and avoid being tricked again.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlertBot

· 01-14 06:33

It's the same old trick again, WL is a one-size-fits-all, and regular participants get slapped in the face.

View OriginalReply0