2026-01-14 05:29:36

A certain exchange plans to launch an upgrade for the BTC-USD trading pair at 08:00 UTC on January 15th — changing the minimum price movement unit from 0.1 to 1 DUSD. It sounds like a small change, but it has a significant impact on trading experience. The increased precision results in lower slippage, and this advantage becomes especially apparent during sharp market fluctuations, particularly for Asian traders who will experience faster response times.

This platform itself has introduced many innovations in the Perp space — supporting both BNB Chain and Solana blockchains, achieving cross-chain deployment. Other product highlights include a yield-bearing mechanism, allowing traders to earn returns while trading. It seems to be a strategy to compete in the highly competitive perpetual contract market in 2026 through technology and innovative models.

BTC0,22%

BNB1,04%

SOL0,76%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MechanicalMartel

· 01-16 23:15

Reducing slippage is indeed good news for us who trade frequently, especially during times of high volatility.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinEnjoyer

· 01-16 14:50

Is the accuracy from 0.1 to 1? The change doesn't seem significant, but for high-frequency traders, it's really a trap... How much can this speed improve during the Asian session? --- The yield-bearing mechanism sounds good, but can this cross-chain layout really be stable, or is it just another project team's PPT promise? --- Upgrading on January 15th, let's see if there are any surprises. The biggest fear with exchange changes is overhyped pre-launch, only to find the experience unchanged. --- Supporting both BNB and Solana at the same time? Isn't that just risk diversification? The real issue is whether the liquidity is sufficient. --- Lower slippage sounds great, but we all know that such upgrades often come with new problems. There will probably be another round of complaints then. --- Yield-bearing + perpetual contracts, this combination is interesting... but it depends on the actual yield; don't let it be another inflated gimmick.

View OriginalReply0

gm_or_ngmi

· 01-16 02:16

Will the liquidity actually worsen if the slippage is too low? That's the key question.

View OriginalReply0

DaoTherapy

· 01-15 20:55

Something's off. Changing from 0.1 to 1 DUSD? Is this an improvement in precision or a step back... The slippage is lower but the price gradient has become coarser. Will it still be responsive during market volatility? Cross-chain Perp is getting so competitive now. The yield mechanism sounds good, but it depends on the actual return rate. I suspect it might be another new trick to trap 🐔.

View OriginalReply0

StealthDeployer

· 01-14 05:59

Low slippage is truly advantageous. During the Asian session, this upgrade needs to be tested quickly; otherwise, you'll miss out and get swept away.

View OriginalReply0

DisillusiionOracle

· 01-14 05:55

Hmm... it's the same precision optimization approach, all just to secure a competitive edge.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHuntress

· 01-14 05:51

Adjusting precision from 0.1 to 1? Wait, this data is reversed, right? It should be decreasing precision, and how could the slippage be lower...

View OriginalReply0

ShibaMillionairen't

· 01-14 05:46

Uh, changing precision from 0.1 to 1? Did this guy get it backwards... A lower slippage is a good thing, but on January 15th, you need to stick to it, or you'll get caught.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-14 05:41

The precision ranges from 0.1 to 1., which may not seem like much, but in actual trading, the difference is quite significant, especially when volatility is high, making it less easy to slip on the trend with the spread.

View OriginalReply0