Recently, many people in the crypto circle have been discussing an interesting topic—giving money to others, does that mean you have the right to "dictate" how they use it?

A founder of a major exchange shared a viewpoint on social media that’s worth pondering. He supports Siyuan’s decision to destroy all the donations received, with a straightforward reason: giving someone money doesn’t mean they have to act according to your wishes. This sounds simple, but it really hits the core of many controversies. He also mentioned that Siyuan clearly wants to completely cut ties with certain meme projects; if the donations are redirected to the company or its employees, it might cause trouble for the organization.

Interestingly, his perspective on token burn mechanisms is also quite representative. Many people see burning as a waste, but his view is different—BNB Chain burns tokens worth over $1 billion every quarter, which is essentially a deflationary measure. For token holders, reducing the total circulating supply means the remaining tokens have a higher relative value. As a holder, he even expressed gratitude to anyone participating in the burn.

This reflects an interesting market logic: in a token economy, the burn mechanism and holder incentives are often linked. When your stance differs, your perspective on burning can be completely different.