Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I've been observing two projects, ZAMA and FOGO, and it's quite an interesting phenomenon. ZAMA's token hasn't officially started selling yet, and the mainnet is not live, but the contract was released early. As a result, it was out for several days, and all market expectations during the contract's release period were basically exhausted. Looking at FOGO, it follows a similar pattern; the two projects' processes are almost indistinguishable. Honestly, this kind of approach isn't very attractive. When they officially launch later, it might even turn into a negative factor. Where's the problem? It's that all the hype was released prematurely. When it's time to generate real buzz, the market has already grown tired of it. This phenomenon has been quite common recently, with the project teams and the market always out of sync.