Michael Saylor recently expressed an interesting viewpoint: even if Bitcoin soars to a new high of $150,000, he would not hesitate to refuse if asked to give up something.

What is this "something"? It could be official adoption by banks, mainstream ETF products, accounting recognition rights, or clear regulatory support from the SEC, CFTC, or even the Treasury Department.

He would choose infrastructure over price. This is not just psychological comfort but a deep-seated belief.

Look at the current situation: financial giants like Citibank and Schroders are starting to offer Bitcoin custody services; banking institutions are gradually dropping their guard and treating Bitcoin as a normal asset; regulatory attitudes have shifted from "this is speculative" to "this is a genuine asset class." These changes won't appear on a five-minute chart, but they are quietly reshaping the fundamentals of the entire market.

Most people focus on price fluctuations and chase the rise of numbers. Saylor's way of thinking is completely different—he focuses on the infrastructure layer behind these numbers.

He mentioned that the past 90 days have simply provided more opportunities for "long-term visionaries," which is clearly not the mindset of a trader. This is a statement from someone thinking on a multi-decade scale—he's not concerned with the next candle but with the next decade.