2026-01-14 04:42:45

Bitcoin has been quite interesting lately. The price is approaching $96,000, and many are asking what will happen next. The end of January might be a key point.

There's an old topic here—the four-year cycle of Bitcoin. It halves every four years, and the market performance fluctuates accordingly, cycle after cycle. But the question is: can this pattern still continue to dominate the subsequent market trends? Or has the market environment changed, and the historical pattern needs to be updated?

Anyway, this recent surge has indeed given the market some expectations. Whether it can break the existing rhythm, we'll see by the end of January.

BTC-0,9%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 01-16 16:38

Is 96K really coming? It still feels like hesitation and dithering The four-year cycle theory has long been outdated; after institutional entry, all patterns have changed Just place a bet at the end of January, since you can't hold on anyway Should the historical pattern be updated? Haha, patterns are always just a way for retail investors to comfort themselves This wave of rise feels a bit fake, are the main players cutting losses again? Wait a minute, whether it drops or rises, it’s all just a fall; why bother fussing over cycles

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-14 21:07

According to on-chain data, the trading pattern at the 96000 price level is a bit abnormal... Usually, before such key nodes, there are large wallets pre-positioning, and I have already identified the movements of several suspicious addresses. The 4-year cycle? It's obvious that the market is trying to validate itself, but the true fund flows have long exposed the real intentions before the halving. Will it be clear by the end of January? I have already guessed it.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSurvivor

· 01-14 05:12

Damn, 96k is really coming. I give a 70% chance that it will break 100k by the end of January.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotBot

· 01-14 05:05

If 96k can't be broken, then the four-year cycle theory really needs to be revised.

View OriginalReply0

LonelyAnchorman

· 01-14 05:05

96k is really a hurdle; only breaking through counts Everyone whose mentality is collapsing is waiting until the end of January; it's actually all gambler's psychology That four-year cycle theory... should have been outdated long ago, the rules completely changed after institutions entered the market This wave of rise is fierce, but I'm still a bit hesitant; I feel that high-level oscillation is more likely To put it simply, it's about who has a stronger mentality

View OriginalReply0

OnlyOnMainnet

· 01-14 05:04

96k is really a threshold; we'll know whether it breaks through in January. --- Is the four-year cycle still useful now? Honestly, I'm a bit skeptical. --- Waiting again until the end of January. I'm the type to get annoyed by waiting. --- Hope for the best, but still keep your wallets tight, everyone. --- Is the historical pattern invalid? Haha, I've heard that kind of talk too many times. --- Has it broken through 96k? Why am I still so anxious? --- The cycle theory is outdated; now it's a game for big institutions. --- See you in January for the verdict. By then, we'll see who is dumping the market.

View OriginalReply0

StealthMoon

· 01-14 04:52

96k just want to run? I think it's a gamble; breaking 100k by the end of January is the real story.

View OriginalReply0