Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
How much do institutional investors actually dominate single-family home purchases? A lot less than people think.
Here's the thing—large institutional players are grabbing headlines, but they're really just a drop in the bucket. When you look at the actual numbers, they account for a tiny fraction of the market. So what happens if you impose a blanket ban on them? The homes they'd normally buy don't disappear from the market. Instead, smaller investors step in and fill that gap. You're not eliminating demand; you're just swapping one type of buyer for another.
The real question isn't whether we should ban institutional investors. It's whether limiting one group of players actually solves the housing affordability crisis—or if we're just reshuffling who's buying the houses while the underlying issues stay put.