Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
My friend recently asked me a question: "With so many public chains, which one should I choose?" I was looking at a phone case at the time and suddenly thought—choosing a public chain is a bit like browsing the phone market.
You see, in the Android ecosystem, various brands showcase their strengths—some excel at photography, some have super high frame rates for gaming, and some are ridiculously cheap. Isn't the current public chain ecosystem similar? Ethereum is the pioneer, laying the foundation, but later users found transactions are expensive and slow; new players like Solana and Avalanche jumped in saying they are faster and cheaper, which definitely attracted many.
But here’s the problem: financial applications require something different. They don’t need a "jack of all trades," but rather specialists. Just like you wouldn’t use a regular phone for precision medical equipment, right? The financial world is actually looking for something like this—fast, absolutely secure, and most importantly, compliant.
Dusk Network is taking this route. Other public chains are competing on versatility—anything can be built, anything can be touched. But Dusk has been clear from the start about its direction: focus on financial assets and compliant interactions, dedicating all its efforts here. This choice is quite interesting because it sacrifices broad applicability for deep specialization. In terms of underlying architecture, the privacy protection aspect is handled differently—