2026-01-09 18:24:27

In the crypto market, the projects that make money often follow a certain playbook: stirring emotions, creating liquidity, and weaving narratives. But projects like Max go against the grain; their economic model is inherently resistant to short-term speculation, their stories aren't overly "magical," and they require participants to have enough patience.

This presents a dilemma: to truly succeed—whether in gaining market recognition or achieving the original vision—how should Max choose?

One path is to learn how to "play the market." Moderately embrace hype, flexibly use storytelling techniques, which can help quickly accumulate users, expand influence, and boost liquidity. Growth may indeed be faster, but at what cost? The core理念 might be diluted, and the participants may not truly believe in the project, ultimately becoming what they initially disliked.

The other path is to stay true to the original intention. Firmly reject speculative tactics and only attract participants who genuinely understand and agree with the project's理念. While this keeps the project pure, development will be slower, and the time window is limited—miss it, and you might truly miss out.

Can you really have both fish and bear paws? Or is there a third way we haven't thought of? Feel free to share your thoughts.

MAX0,21%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

24 Likes

Reward
24
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingerGas

· 01-12 16:32

Isn't this just the classic pooling equilibrium vs separating equilibrium? In simple terms, Max needs to find a Nash equilibrium between the signal discrimination cost and market liquidity... But honestly, most projects overestimate their ability to satisfy both sides simultaneously.

View OriginalReply0

GreenCandleCollector

· 01-12 02:26

Holding on to the original intention will most likely lead to failure in the end, but completely messing it up at least provides short-term satisfaction. It all depends on who holds the power of choice.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithAPlan

· 01-10 15:08

Honestly, Max's persistence will eventually be taught a lesson by the market. There really isn't a third way—either compromise or wait to die, that's the reality. Instead of obsessing, why not see if you can find a balance point—moderate marketing but without crossing the line. I actually think it's okay to be slow; it's better than becoming the thing you hate most. This is the real test for founders—whether to stand firm or to collapse, choose wisely.

View OriginalReply0

HypotheticalLiquidator

· 01-09 20:37

In plain terms, Max is walking a tightrope—stir up some emotions, and the lending rate soars; stick to the original intention, but the health factors are declining. In the end, there's an 80% chance of a chain reaction of liquidations.

View OriginalReply0

ProveMyZK

· 01-09 18:51

Projects that stick to their original intention often don't last long, but there's no point in selling out for fame... --- Honestly, things like Max are destined to walk a tightrope. If you can't let go of marketing, you'll be drowned out; if you're too good at marketing, you'll lose your soul. --- The third way? It doesn't exist. The crypto world is this cruel. --- I think true breakthrough isn't about either/or, but about finding that critical point — having principles but also knowing how to adapt. --- Uh, isn't this the choice all startup projects face? Nothing special. --- Can we change our perspective? Instead of obsessing over how to choose, think about who is truly a long-termist. --- Honestly, attracting more people can be troublesome because of the mix, but being too niche also means you can't go far... --- Having played many projects, I found that those that survive in the end are the ones that strike the best balance.

View OriginalReply0

SadMoneyMeow

· 01-09 18:51

Sounds nice, but the reality is slow death or selling oneself; there is no third option.

View OriginalReply0

AllInAlice

· 01-09 18:51

Honestly, the projects that are still holding on are already educated by the market; they either change their tune or disappear altogether.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 01-09 18:46

The truth is, projects that stubbornly stick to their original intentions often don't survive the next bull market, but those who learn to play the market eventually turn into worthless tokens. I actually want to see if Max can find that balance point—not through compromise, but through wisdom.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainNewbie

· 01-09 18:33

To be honest, I've seen this trick from Max many times. In the end, there's either compromise or death—there's no third option.

View OriginalReply0