2026-01-09 18:01:50

So here's what's happening—the whole shareholder democracy thing is getting reshuffled. You've got one side arguing that stock owners should have real say in how companies operate. But increasingly, we're seeing policy lean toward giving CEOs more room to maneuver without constant scrutiny from shareholders.

This tension matters beyond Wall Street. It touches on how wealth concentrates, how decisions get made at the top, and what incentives actually drive corporate behavior. When you tip the scale toward executive freedom, you're essentially saying founder/CEO vision trumps distributed ownership stakes.

The ripple effects? Look at executive compensation, strategic pivots, M&A activity—all shaped by who has the actual leverage in the room. Worth thinking about whether that's sustainable long-term.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AltcoinHunter

· 01-12 03:35

Basically, big players make the decisions, and small retail investors are just there to play along... This is exactly the same as governance issues in the crypto circle. The greater the CEO's power, the less say retail investors have... No one can stop this wave of profit-taking. Wait, isn't this logic similar to what some project teams do before running away... I've seen through it long ago; where power is concentrated, corruption is inevitable. This is an unchanging law. So in the end, decentralization might be the only way to save this situation, right? That's why I go all-in on Web3. Traditional finance has long been rotten. Small shareholders are like tokens locked up; their voting rights are basically nonexistent. The cycle of human history always comes down to the rulers making the decisions... Honestly, this logic is perfectly applicable to tokenomics, and it’s a bit scary. The bigger the CEO's power, the more we small retail investors resemble leeks being harvested. So I still believe in decentralized governance, even though it’s not perfect either.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 01-11 05:36

Laughing to death, this is the "Life and Death Book" of shareholder democracy. Basically, it's still a power game. CEOs have long ignored the words of retail shareholders. --- The greater the executive freedom, the more retail shareholders become like supporting roles. I've seen too many scripts like this in the crypto world. --- Concentration of wealth and centralized decision-making—sounds a lot like the déjà vu of certain project teams... --- "Executive freedom" sounds pretty good, but in reality, it's just a fancy way of saying "I call the shots." Dear shareholders, please step aside. --- Still studying long-term sustainability? Bro, short-term cashing out is the real theme.

View OriginalReply0

WalletAnxietyPatient

· 01-10 10:09

ngl this is the dark side of modern capitalism. The CEO makes all the decisions, and us small retail investors are really just ornaments... By the way, isn't this logic just legitimizing the rich's way of grabbing money? Another round of wealth transfer upwards, used to it The greater the CEO's power, the better. Anyway, we can't change it, so it's better to get on board early This system will collapse sooner or later, just don't know when But if this keeps up, the next 2008 will be even worse, right? Still, you have to defend with your own wallet. Don't rely on those boards of directors.

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessApe

· 01-10 06:21

NGL, this is just like Game of Thrones—shareholders' voting power is getting weaker, but the CEO can do whatever they want... How long can this TM last? Honestly, it's all about money; ordinary shareholders have no bargaining power. The founder's word seems free, but what about the risks? Putting everything on the CEO's shoulders will eventually lead to problems. In the long run, it's definitely unsustainable, but short-term arbitrageurs are already making a killing. These executive compensations are indeed outrageous; having the distribution power in their own hands is inherently problematic. Feels more and more like a game controlled by a few people.

View OriginalReply0

CryingOldWallet

· 01-09 18:32

ngl This is the Game of Thrones, the CEO is getting more and more wild, retail investors are being sidelined... In the long run, this thing will definitely have problems. I've seen through this logic a long time ago; anyway, the ones who always end up losing are those who actually hold shares. Basically, it's the big shots in their circle playing around, and we retail investors are just here to watch the fun, haha. The greater the CEO's autonomy, the less favorable it is for retail investors... Isn't this just wealth harvesting? Wait, this is similar to some on-chain governance I’ve seen; concentrated power never leads to good results. Honestly, this kind of imbalance will eventually backfire, what do you guys think? This institutional design is really brilliant—CEO power is unlimited, and shareholders' say drops straight down... It's hard to imagine how this can continue. By the way, why isn’t this being tested in the crypto community first... Decentralized voting is much more reliable than this setup.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxOpener

· 01-09 18:20

NGL, this is just the internal competition of capitalism. The CEO makes all the decisions, and retail investors are just the chives. --- The greater the CEO's freedom, the easier it is to do whatever they want. Who wants that... except the CEO themselves. --- Wait, doesn't this mean power is becoming more concentrated? It feels completely opposite to the original intention of decentralization in crypto. --- So in the end, the strong always eat the weak; minority shareholders can only watch... it's a bit hopeless. --- Really, shareholder democracy has always been a joke. Basically, whoever has more money has more say. --- M&A can be done at will; anyway, losses are shared by everyone, profits go to the CEO... classic move. --- I've seen too much of this kind of imbalance in crypto—centralization is the inevitable outcome. --- What to do? Small shareholders already have weak voting rights, and now they're being pushed down further... long-term sustainability is impossible. --- The compensation part is too outrageous. The CEO's pay is hundreds of times that of retail investors' annual salary. This data needs to be exposed.

View OriginalReply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 01-09 18:10

In simple terms, it means that management's power is increasing, and shareholders' voice is being sidelined. Isn't this the privilege escalation vulnerability in smart contracts? The CEO's authority is unchecked, and sooner or later, something will go wrong.

View OriginalReply0

GetRichLeek

· 01-09 18:03

Hmm... it's that same CEO-decides-all game again, retail shareholders are just there to be ATMs.

View OriginalReply0