Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Privacy and regulation have always been a pair of archrivals in the crypto ecosystem. On one hand, protecting user privacy; on the other, meeting compliance requirements. The two seem inherently opposed—privacy technology emphasizes invisibility of information, while regulatory audits require transparency of the ledger.
Recently, Dusk has been working on something interesting: they are attempting to combine zero-knowledge proof(ZKP) technology with regulatory audits. At first glance, it sounds a bit magical—the core of zero-knowledge proofs is "I can prove that something is true without revealing any specific details," whereas the regulatory demand is "to open up the data so I can see clearly." How can these two requirements be satisfied simultaneously?
Their solution is to design a layered verification system. To use an analogy: imagine a special vault where all assets are stored in completely private safes. Regulators hold a "透视钥匙" (perspective key), which has a very special purpose—it cannot see specific amounts or whose assets they are, but can immediately verify three points: first, that there are assets inside the safe (proof of existence); second, that the source of funds has been compliant (source compliance verification); third, that all transactions conform to preset rules (transaction validity verification).
The cleverness of this design lies in the fact that users' specific private data remains invisible at all times, yet the overall risk control capability of the system is even stronger. Regulators can ensure network compliance without needing to see detailed account information, and user privacy is truly protected. This "visible risk, invisible data" approach may really solve a long-standing problem in the industry.