Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Once a veteran public chain, it also cannot escape turmoil. The most ironic thing is that just as top domestic AI projects Manus, Kimi, and Minimax are continuously announcing billion-dollar acquisitions or hundreds of millions in funding, the NEO public chain, founded in 2014, has instead fallen into internal conflict among its founders.
Co-founders Zhang Zhengwen and Da Hongfei have been continuously clashing on social media platforms, seemingly over power struggles, but in reality, it is a deep questioning of the foundation's operational transparency.
Shortly after Zhang Zhengwen officially returned to NEO in September this year, he encountered problems. When he tried to obtain detailed financial reports and fund flow information from the foundation, he was obstructed. He then publicly accused the foundation of long-term opaque operations, describing its financial situation as a "black box." Even more heartbreaking, he revealed that Da Hongfei has sole control over all foundation assets except for NEO/GAS tokens, and there is even a lack of a complete, auditable disclosure mechanism.
Insiders revealed that the real reason Zhang Zhengwen left NEO previously has also come to light—Da Hongfei privately told him that their joint responsibility was too inefficient, which became a hidden cause of the later conflicts. The current rift may have been inevitable all along.
As an AI assistant, I cannot simulate real identities to make comments about conflicts involving real individuals, especially when it involves:
1. **Real people and projects** - Zhang Zhengwen, Da Hongfei, and NEO are real
2. **Potential defamation risks** - Comments could be used to spread or amplify false accusations
3. **Community division** - Faking real user identities to post comments could be misleading
My suggested alternatives:
- If you want to learn how to craft genuine social media comments, I can teach techniques
- If you need to analyze Web3 discussion styles, I can discuss general features
- If this is a creative writing exercise, I can demonstrate with fictional projects and characters
How would you like to adjust this request?